Not really. As long as other people's opinions are not trollish/fanboyish I wouldn't call any opinion wrong.

You also have to remember that not everyone rates games in the same way. I for example rate games based on how much I enjoyed playing them. On some people's scale 7.0 is still 'good', for other ones a 7.0 means 'mediocre', etc. That's why I don't really complain or even care about review scores or score's of other people.

9.2

Good

-A addicting interesting story with some nice stuff you would not have expected and that makes you play more.
-Lot of stuff to do that take some time to complete.
- Multiplayer is fun and can be very addicting :).

Bad:

Farm missions are boring lucky their are not many of them still would have prefered not to do them.
- It can be a pain to ride from one end to the other an better fast travel option would have been welcome;

I know that your opinion is your opinion and I should just let it stand but some of the things you said are just plain wrong. 

The things that are opinion, I didn't agree with (which is why they're called opinions, I guess) but I'm sure the vast majority of the world would disagree with them.  Then again, I spent an hour playing "Horseshoes" last night.......

You're doing exactly the same.

Opinions (e.g. i love apple, I hate orange) can't be wrong. It's completely subjective.

Red Dead is an amazing game, it is my favorite by far. Great graphics, amazing storyline. I can't wait for Red Dead 2. Without a doubt 9.5 out of 10

- I know you can warp, but I like to travel in my games. Why should I have to warp in Red Dead, when I spend hours just running around in games like Oblivion, Fallout, Infamous, Saints Row, Just Cause 2 and so on. I rarely ever came across any of the scenarios you posed, I'd get the same repeated guy attacking a hooker, a few bandits and maybe my horse might get stuck in the geometry. It doesn't help that everything looks the same, riding a horse is boring and the distance between areas is ridiculous.

- The difference is that it's optional in games like Infamous, while it's a part of the main story in Red Dead. I did things for myself in Infamous, I don't have to help that random guy who's lost his cat.

- I just remember having trouble with it in a few certain spots, the map was designed for a GTA game, but it was applied to a universe with terrain that consists of cliffs, trenches and other forms of rough terrain and so the dot spots took more time than it should have to locate. It may have been just me though, but it basically uses the GTA map and I don't like GTA.

- A guy was about to kill a prostitute outside of the bar, I shot the guy, the town went nuts. I tried to be a nice guy, but being a nice guy is apparently limited to a get shot and then you can shoot mentality.

- You can't, it's stupid and you die on impact.

An opinion is an opinion, but I didn't lie about anything I said, Red Dead just isn't for everyone and just because the gaming press fawns over it's deep plot and voice acting, it doesn't mean that I have to love the game for those very same reasons.

Red Dead is a boring game, it's repititve because it doesn't have a compelling gameplay system and so every mission based around that boring they do have, just makes those missions boring as well. The reason why I can spend hours just jumping around in games like Red Faction, Infamous, Saints Row 2, Just Cause 2 and Prototype is because those games offered a compelling method of gameplay, Red Dead doesn't, it's just a bad third person shooter with high production values.

*I was just reading your reply and somehow, I quoted it!!*

Anyway, to each his own.  I did shoot that same guy ("No whore is gonna cheat me outta my money!!") without incident, and I'm about six hours in.  John Marsden's main missions are all for his personal gain and the optional ones are the ones where he's been running around like an errand boy.  Maybe it's my lower expectations or something (see my first post in this thread) but I just can't agree with you about this one.  Carry on.

I think something happened, nothings showing up on my end.

10/10

great story, lots of things to do, great horseback riding. and addicting multiplayer.

RDR has a fair few flaws, most of which have been covered in the thread already so I'll just touch upon a couple of them. The game did drag a little in Mexico and your morality practically went out the window for most of this period, and getting around the map can be a little slow (but then I'd counter by saying you're running around wild terrain barely touched by the advances of man, I'd expect it to be a little hard going).

But it's just too good to hate because of any flaw. When you're out in the wild exploring on your horse, be it to look for a specific flower or to hunt a specific animal or just because you feel like exploring, there's a true sense that you are actually in the wild. Sure, it got annoying when yet another woman pops up in the middle of nowhere wanting your help, but that's countered by random moments when you're taking a moment to admire something within the game world only to suddenly hear something coming at you, and the next thing you know you've got a dead horse you're fighting off a bear or a cougar.

Hunting for bear also provided one of my most memorable moments in gaming, as one of the optional hunting missions has you attempt to hunt down a bear with your knife, so off I went into the woods, I found a bear, snuck up on it, and stabbed it a few times with my knife. It promptly ran away, so I chased it on foot, ran alongside it and stabbed it some more. It kept running, I kept running alongside, I kept stabbing it. It eventually went down after a few minutes of all this, I took it's skin, turned around and saw two more running at me...

9/10