By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - And we are back to Square 1 as Sony implicates Anonymous to US House Probe

theprof00 said:
thranx said:

Thats great, was anyhting factually wrong in what I stated? For dealing with facts you sure dont use many. Morals? Who is being morally wrong here? How is doing something to what I own a moral wrong (not that i own a ps3 nor have i ever hacked anyhting)

You said that it's safe to assume that hacking a console is legal, citing pc and cellphones as reasoning.

You are making an argument based on a theory. Theory =|= fact.

We can talk all day about why pc and cell phones would be exceptions, and you can tell me how it's all the same. We'll never agree.

In the case of cell phones, it was decided that not allowing jailbreaking gave too much power to cell phone companies. In fact, the ruling on it is more related to the number-integrity case that happened a few years before in which it was decided by law that cell phones were required to let you take your own telephone number to a different carrier. The idea was that phone companies were locking people in unfairly by a customer losing their number.This is the same situation people with 600$ phones face today. Want to leave verizon because it's 100$/ month? Nope, not allowed, otherwise your phone is worthless. Cellphone jailbreaking ruling is consumer protection, not consumer rights.


You see why it's hopeless?



Around the Network
o_O.Q said:

"A company has a right to refuse additional service to a customer who does things with their equipment they disagree with and violates the terms and conditions of owning" o_O huh?" "conditions of owning"? but i tought that when you own hardware you could do what you wanted with it? someone mentioned ps3s being similar to computers which are hacked all the time and as a result ps3s should also be allowed to be hacked... this is a very confusing issue... i mean since i bought it with my money i should be able to modify it so that i can go online and shoot guys through walls in CoD for example because its my property and i have the right

XBox Live is a service.  A company can set practices in place where, where if you don't mean certain criterion, they don't have to serve you (same goes with PSN, by the way).  This criterion can include not modifying your system.  There is a case of whether or not you own equipment, if you are legally able to modify it, but not access to a service of a company.  Also, you don't own software.  When you get software, you buy a license for use.   There is debate whether or not one can modify software also.  In that case, the licensing agreement will often say no, and you end up losing the right to use that software.  Hardware is seen as a different story though.  And yes, it gets confusing.

So while one can say you can modify your hardware to enable that, they can also deny you the ability to get on the server.  Issue of modifying for use has been in the courts.  Nintendo, I believe, lost the court case against the company that made the Game Genie, for example.



LivingMetal said:
theprof00 said:
thranx said:

Thats great, was anyhting factually wrong in what I stated? For dealing with facts you sure dont use many. Morals? Who is being morally wrong here? How is doing something to what I own a moral wrong (not that i own a ps3 nor have i ever hacked anyhting)

You said that it's safe to assume that hacking a console is legal, citing pc and cellphones as reasoning.

You are making an argument based on a theory. Theory =|= fact.

We can talk all day about why pc and cell phones would be exceptions, and you can tell me how it's all the same. We'll never agree.

In the case of cell phones, it was decided that not allowing jailbreaking gave too much power to cell phone companies. In fact, the ruling on it is more related to the number-integrity case that happened a few years before in which it was decided by law that cell phones were required to let you take your own telephone number to a different carrier. The idea was that phone companies were locking people in unfairly by a customer losing their number.This is the same situation people with 600$ phones face today. Want to leave verizon because it's 100$/ month? Nope, not allowed, otherwise your phone is worthless. Cellphone jailbreaking ruling is consumer protection, not consumer rights.


You see why it's hopeless?

I brought up points that showed occasions were hacking your own equiptment was legal. You are more than welcome to show me some court cases people have lost for hacking their own hardware. I would love the info.



thranx said:
LivingMetal said:
theprof00 said:
thranx said:

Thats great, was anyhting factually wrong in what I stated? For dealing with facts you sure dont use many. Morals? Who is being morally wrong here? How is doing something to what I own a moral wrong (not that i own a ps3 nor have i ever hacked anyhting)

You said that it's safe to assume that hacking a console is legal, citing pc and cellphones as reasoning.

You are making an argument based on a theory. Theory =|= fact.

We can talk all day about why pc and cell phones would be exceptions, and you can tell me how it's all the same. We'll never agree.

In the case of cell phones, it was decided that not allowing jailbreaking gave too much power to cell phone companies. In fact, the ruling on it is more related to the number-integrity case that happened a few years before in which it was decided by law that cell phones were required to let you take your own telephone number to a different carrier. The idea was that phone companies were locking people in unfairly by a customer losing their number.This is the same situation people with 600$ phones face today. Want to leave verizon because it's 100$/ month? Nope, not allowed, otherwise your phone is worthless. Cellphone jailbreaking ruling is consumer protection, not consumer rights.


You see why it's hopeless?

I brought up points that showed occasions were hacking your own equiptment was legal. You are more than welcome to show me some court cases people have lost for hacking their own hardware. I would love the info.


The context and subject here is Sony and the PS3.  Let's not divert attention from things we cannot sucessfully argue.  Peace.



thranx said:
theprof00 said:
thranx said:

Thats great, was anyhting factually wrong in what I stated? For dealing with facts you sure dont use many. Morals? Who is being morally wrong here? How is doing something to what I own a moral wrong (not that i own a ps3 nor have i ever hacked anyhting)

You said that it's safe to assume that hacking a console is legal, citing pc and cellphones as reasoning.

You are making an argument based on a theory. Theory =|= fact.

We can talk all day about why pc and cell phones would be exceptions, and you can tell me how it's all the same. We'll never agree.

In the case of cell phones, it was decided that not allowing jailbreaking gave too much power to cell phone companies. In fact, the ruling on it is more related to the number-integrity case that happened a few years before in which it was decided by law that cell phones were required to let you take your own telephone number to a different carrier. The idea was that phone companies were locking people in unfairly by a customer losing their number.This is the same situation people with 600$ phones face today. Want to leave verizon because it's 100$/ month? Nope, not allowed, otherwise your phone is worthless. Cellphone jailbreaking ruling is consumer protection, not consumer rights.

I clearly stated it was up in the air in the first sentance. But given that all other case law that i have read allows you to hack your own equiptment i would lean towards hacking your console as ok also. But again it is not set in stone which i also said. Basically we really will not know unitl there is another court case, which i also said. Feel free to show me cases were people have been punished for hacking their own hardware. The more info i can get, the better  i can understand the situation.

 

if we can hack computers, and if people in sony think the ps3 is a computer than what are we supposed to think?

" "Speaking about the PS3, we never said we will release a game console," he said. "It is radically different from the previous PlayStation. It is clearly a computer. Indeed, with a game console, you need to take out any unnecessary elements inside the console in order to decrease its cost. ... This will of course apply to the PS3 as well."

""However, the PS3 is a computer," Kutaragi said. "Lowering costs is important but more important is its capacity to evolve. I think the HDD will gain in capacity. If a new technology gets into mainstream PCs, the PS3 will have to adopt it as well. Maybe the Blu-ray drive will become writable. Well, maybe not at this point.""

http://www.1up.com/news/hey-ps3-computer-game-system

It's like having a convertible car commercial, demonstrating it's engine, and then dropping 5 tons in the backseat and being like, "this isn't just a car....it's a truck-vertible" lol It's not really a truck, and people understand that. BUT, I don't want to buy a truck, I want a car with lots of power and the ability to carry things that might be farily large and heavy.

It's just spin, it's just marketing.



Around the Network
LivingMetal said:
thranx said:
LivingMetal said:
theprof00 said:
thranx said:

Thats great, was anyhting factually wrong in what I stated? For dealing with facts you sure dont use many. Morals? Who is being morally wrong here? How is doing something to what I own a moral wrong (not that i own a ps3 nor have i ever hacked anyhting)

You said that it's safe to assume that hacking a console is legal, citing pc and cellphones as reasoning.

You are making an argument based on a theory. Theory =|= fact.

We can talk all day about why pc and cell phones would be exceptions, and you can tell me how it's all the same. We'll never agree.

In the case of cell phones, it was decided that not allowing jailbreaking gave too much power to cell phone companies. In fact, the ruling on it is more related to the number-integrity case that happened a few years before in which it was decided by law that cell phones were required to let you take your own telephone number to a different carrier. The idea was that phone companies were locking people in unfairly by a customer losing their number.This is the same situation people with 600$ phones face today. Want to leave verizon because it's 100$/ month? Nope, not allowed, otherwise your phone is worthless. Cellphone jailbreaking ruling is consumer protection, not consumer rights.


You see why it's hopeless?

I brought up points that showed occasions were hacking your own equiptment was legal. You are more than welcome to show me some court cases people have lost for hacking their own hardware. I would love the info.


The context and subject here is Sony and the PS3.  Let's not divert attention from things we cannot sucessfully argue.  Peace.

did you not see my qoute from ken? I am relating the ps3 to the pc just as he has done and then inferring that since it is legal to hack your own pc it is legal to hack your ps3. so i am talking about the ps3 here.



so why therefore are people arguing that hacking should be allowed on ps3 when it is fact that several hackers interfered with the online system for example in CoD... why is sony getting so much crap about taking out other os when it would have led to this and piracy?



LivingMetal said:
thranx said:
LivingMetal said:
theprof00 said:
thranx said:

Thats great, was anyhting factually wrong in what I stated? For dealing with facts you sure dont use many. Morals? Who is being morally wrong here? How is doing something to what I own a moral wrong (not that i own a ps3 nor have i ever hacked anyhting)

You said that it's safe to assume that hacking a console is legal, citing pc and cellphones as reasoning.

You are making an argument based on a theory. Theory =|= fact.

We can talk all day about why pc and cell phones would be exceptions, and you can tell me how it's all the same. We'll never agree.

In the case of cell phones, it was decided that not allowing jailbreaking gave too much power to cell phone companies. In fact, the ruling on it is more related to the number-integrity case that happened a few years before in which it was decided by law that cell phones were required to let you take your own telephone number to a different carrier. The idea was that phone companies were locking people in unfairly by a customer losing their number.This is the same situation people with 600$ phones face today. Want to leave verizon because it's 100$/ month? Nope, not allowed, otherwise your phone is worthless. Cellphone jailbreaking ruling is consumer protection, not consumer rights.


You see why it's hopeless?

I brought up points that showed occasions were hacking your own equiptment was legal. You are more than welcome to show me some court cases people have lost for hacking their own hardware. I would love the info.


The context and subject here is Sony and the PS3.  Let's not divert attention from things we cannot sucessfully argue.  Peace.

And what will you do if I find some. I'm curious.

If I went and got stuff showing that you cannot hack your car computer, what would you do?



theprof00 said:
thranx said:
theprof00 said:
thranx said:

Thats great, was anyhting factually wrong in what I stated? For dealing with facts you sure dont use many. Morals? Who is being morally wrong here? How is doing something to what I own a moral wrong (not that i own a ps3 nor have i ever hacked anyhting)

You said that it's safe to assume that hacking a console is legal, citing pc and cellphones as reasoning.

You are making an argument based on a theory. Theory =|= fact.

We can talk all day about why pc and cell phones would be exceptions, and you can tell me how it's all the same. We'll never agree.

In the case of cell phones, it was decided that not allowing jailbreaking gave too much power to cell phone companies. In fact, the ruling on it is more related to the number-integrity case that happened a few years before in which it was decided by law that cell phones were required to let you take your own telephone number to a different carrier. The idea was that phone companies were locking people in unfairly by a customer losing their number.This is the same situation people with 600$ phones face today. Want to leave verizon because it's 100$/ month? Nope, not allowed, otherwise your phone is worthless. Cellphone jailbreaking ruling is consumer protection, not consumer rights.

I clearly stated it was up in the air in the first sentance. But given that all other case law that i have read allows you to hack your own equiptment i would lean towards hacking your console as ok also. But again it is not set in stone which i also said. Basically we really will not know unitl there is another court case, which i also said. Feel free to show me cases were people have been punished for hacking their own hardware. The more info i can get, the better  i can understand the situation.

 

if we can hack computers, and if people in sony think the ps3 is a computer than what are we supposed to think?

" "Speaking about the PS3, we never said we will release a game console," he said. "It is radically different from the previous PlayStation. It is clearly a computer. Indeed, with a game console, you need to take out any unnecessary elements inside the console in order to decrease its cost. ... This will of course apply to the PS3 as well."

""However, the PS3 is a computer," Kutaragi said. "Lowering costs is important but more important is its capacity to evolve. I think the HDD will gain in capacity. If a new technology gets into mainstream PCs, the PS3 will have to adopt it as well. Maybe the Blu-ray drive will become writable. Well, maybe not at this point.""

http://www.1up.com/news/hey-ps3-computer-game-system

It's like having a convertible car commercial, demonstrating it's engine, and then dropping 5 tons in the backseat and being like, "this isn't just a car....it's a truck-vertible" lol It's not really a truck, and people understand that. BUT, I don't want to buy a truck, I want a car with lots of power and the ability to carry things that might be farily large and heavy.

It's just spin, it's just marketing.


if it has all the same components of a pc, and is called one by some one who helped create the playstation line and worked for sony what are we supposed to think of it as?



theprof00 said:
LivingMetal said:
thranx said:
LivingMetal said:
theprof00 said:
thranx said:

Thats great, was anyhting factually wrong in what I stated? For dealing with facts you sure dont use many. Morals? Who is being morally wrong here? How is doing something to what I own a moral wrong (not that i own a ps3 nor have i ever hacked anyhting)

You said that it's safe to assume that hacking a console is legal, citing pc and cellphones as reasoning.

You are making an argument based on a theory. Theory =|= fact.

We can talk all day about why pc and cell phones would be exceptions, and you can tell me how it's all the same. We'll never agree.

In the case of cell phones, it was decided that not allowing jailbreaking gave too much power to cell phone companies. In fact, the ruling on it is more related to the number-integrity case that happened a few years before in which it was decided by law that cell phones were required to let you take your own telephone number to a different carrier. The idea was that phone companies were locking people in unfairly by a customer losing their number.This is the same situation people with 600$ phones face today. Want to leave verizon because it's 100$/ month? Nope, not allowed, otherwise your phone is worthless. Cellphone jailbreaking ruling is consumer protection, not consumer rights.


You see why it's hopeless?

I brought up points that showed occasions were hacking your own equiptment was legal. You are more than welcome to show me some court cases people have lost for hacking their own hardware. I would love the info.


The context and subject here is Sony and the PS3.  Let's not divert attention from things we cannot sucessfully argue.  Peace.

And what will you do if I find some. I'm curious.

If I went and got stuff showing that you cannot hack your car computer, what would you do?


I will look into the reason why and determine if is similar to a reasson why you would not be able to hack a ps3. It may be that you can't bring your car on public roads once its been hacked just like you can't bring your hacked ps3 onto the psn.

 

http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2002/0708/148.html looks like you are atleast allowed to tell people how to hack their own vehicles

 

edit: I do not hack myself and know very little of it. I am all for freedom though as long as your not hurting others and that all i have vested in this case. I really do not care about hacking as I dont think i'll ever have the need to hack anything myslef, but just because i do not does not mean i want to take those rights away from others that do see the need.