I mean. The easiest way to put it... and if your going to reply to anything, I'd like you to reply to this.
CGI Quality runs a private bank, and I run an MMORPG.
You put your name and adress with both of us.
We both have data breaches which release your name.
He offers you $20, which lets say is what everybody pays more or less.
I offer you $10, and $5 (real cost to me, some bandwith) in "Game store points", and say I can't match what what CGI is offering because I had many more customers, and lost more of their information.
Are you really happy with that? That I screwed up just the same, but compensated you less, because I screwed up bigger?
This is essentially your arguement. Explain to me why it makes sense. (Not that i'm saying they're offering less. I'm just saying what they're offering is about equal to what happens in such a situation.)
To me. If two people commit the same crime or mistake. They both pay the same compensation. No matter who they are.
Or at the very least... if your going to have proportional compensation... the richer person pays more... and not less.














