well i'm just saying that i'm not your target  so don't waist your second shot ^^

Ah, wonk, I think I found a point of discrepancy where (not being polite now) YOU misinterpreted my intention.

"

Just drop this and let's move on."

I didn't mean drop it that Linkz was wrong. I was saying drop it because Baal just made partial claim to the vig kill, and it looked like he was about to get in a lot of hot water... in that he was going to have to claim under pressure. 

Ah, see, I address the linkz part in the following post.

"

Also, his point only rested on there being only one kill last night, and as it turned out, there was only one kill. There could've been 2 (if there is indeed a missing "murder"), but there should've only been one. I think that should be the end of the discussion on that."

Linkz was just contesting that it would be optimal to lynch day one. Baal brought up "there could be more than one death". And this quote above appeared after Baal made that weird claim.

I was just saying that it so happened that linkz was right. As in, his assumptions were wrong, but in the end it worked in his favor. Like, he did say there was no SK, I think, so he may be wrong about that, or some newb is vig. 

I'm surprised Heph was able to figure it out (to the best of my knowledge), and you, prof, who I have looked up to for your logical approach in this game, still seem to not know what is going on.

I've figured out more than you know. I just don't go blabbing on and on about it.

And don't be surprised with Heph. He's a phenom.

prof, prof, prof...

in your defense of yourself prof you are misinterpreting the accusation

there are too many people who although in the game are hardly playing. not enough people are posting for me to feel it is worth while to share my theories.

damn this poison is slow..

can we get a vote count, or something? 

I'm ready to lynch a lurker, there are just too many though

although at least baal can take one more out.