EBWOP: Okay. Well I totally assumed your role incorrectly, so you're not exactly confirmable, but I still buy you as town.

If you're scum and lying, then as it becomes clear that town powers didn't visit you, either a scummate would have to fake the visit with risk of hanging you both, or you'd just die for still being alive. If you're scum and telling the truth(well lying that you don't know who visited you) then it's a horrible role, but I'm sure there's be a counter for it. If you're town and telling the truth, then someone could confirm they visited you if the benefits of such a claim outweigh the danger from coming forward. Scum could try to fakeclaim such a visit, but a counterclaim would end that stunt.

Mmmmm. Waffles

Baal, does leather's post remind you of anything? For the record, I've also seen it from newb scum too so it's more of a nulltell. Still it's generally a horrible "defence."

Then why did you say otherwise in a previous post?

When?

I know you've moved off of me, but I'm still going to address your posts. Since I'm absolutely positive that I am one of the worst possible mislynches for the day, I would very much like to hear your case against prof. He is one of the few I'd be up for trying to lynch today. He seems off this game, and I didn't like his trying to defend me earlier at all.

"This night I got who targeted me" http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4021601

...

Got=Night Action result

As in TruckOSarouslish: My night action result says someone targeted me this night.

Maybe a little of my situation from last game, where I got to the point where I thought anything I posted was being looked at suspiciously, otherwise, not really, should it?

Huh? He's talking about the "who" part.  You should have said, I got that somebody targeted me, not I got who targeted me, saying who quite clearly infers you know exactly who targeted you.