By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - VGC Mafia Round -28- FullMetal Alchemist

Linkzmax said:
A Bad Clown said:

On the topics of the death, the burning is clearly from whoever is Kimbly this game, I'm thinking that he'd be 3rd party. For the "Fellow Officer" it was probably Envy or Pride (King Bradley), who would more than likely be the mafia of this game.

dotdotdot. The "fellow comrade" part is about the burn kill, which means it is either Kimblee as you guessed or it could be Roy Mustang. Baal damn-near claimed the later with the video comment.(See the OP)

Then would Roy Mustang be the vig? Who was it in this game who said Vig should NEVER kill night one?



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
Around the Network
A Bad Clown said:

Then would Roy Mustang be the vig? Who was it in this game who said Vig should NEVER kill night one?

Flavor-wise it would fit, but then again I don't know that it has to.

I did, well I said a vig should almost never kill night one. And Vette was an extremely odd choice at that. IF Baal is a vig he obviously didn't listen to me.



Obviously Linkz wasn't the one who targeted me if he's still voting for me, I still was able to use my role (to see someone targeted me) so I wasn't role blocked.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
Linkzmax said:
A Bad Clown said:

Then would Roy Mustang be the vig? Who was it in this game who said Vig should NEVER kill night one?

Flavor-wise it would fit, but then again I don't know that it has to.

I did, well I said a vig should almost never kill night one. And Vette was an extremely odd choice at that. IF Baal is a vig he obviously didn't listen to me.

I might believe Baal not listening after the other round where he thought prof told him to be scummier, but last game the night one kill came up when I was SK so I'd think he would have noticed to not kill night one as a vig.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
A Bad Clown said:

Obviously Linkz wasn't the one who targeted me if he's still voting for me, I still was able to use my role (to see someone targeted me) so I wasn't role blocked.

This sounds like you're claiming a role that I've seen elsewhere called a Psychic, which knows if someone visits them. It's confirmable because you can't make up someone visiting you or eventually you'd be caught in the lie. And it would be the most horrible scum role ever as it basically outs any town powers, so despite your horrendous play day one I'm buying you as town.

Unvote



Around the Network
Linkzmax said:
Baalzamon said:

Well, I did some very quick reasoning, and actually proved to myself that lynching today has several possibilities of making the game shorter.

I got a question for you guys.  Has it ever been a strategy of an SK to be completely and totally adament that there must not be an SK that game?  It seems risky, for it would be easy to make a mistake, but I just want your opinions.

Also, you speak of how worthless a lot of posts are, I really must ask Linkz, or somebody else doing potals, how many of Linkz comments have been worthless, because I went through all his posts again yesterday and got essentially nothing except bickering and being up to no good.

Please enlighten me on some of the possibilities where the game would be shorter with a lynch today compared to a no lynch. Obviously there's not much time left today and no lynch is already sealed, but I'd love to hear it day two if we're both alive or simply after the round is over.

It is a possible strategy; however, since you're implying I'm an SK I would agree that it'd be extremely risky since a night one with two kills is a pretty clear indicator that there is in fact an SK.  I don't believe in SKs having the option not to kill, so even if I ever landed the role and was given that choice I wouldn't take it. It's unfair to the other factions to pop up night three or so and start killing and sweep the game. So if there's two kills tonight and no vig(once again, very likely a bad idea to shoot tonight) comes forward, then you go right ahead and push for my lynch.

You call them bickering and being up to no good. I call it scumhunting. Gotta wait on a third party or multiples to voice their opinion.

Yeah. You have some explaining to do Baal.



A Bad Clown said:
Linkzmax said:
A Bad Clown said:

Then would Roy Mustang be the vig? Who was it in this game who said Vig should NEVER kill night one?

Flavor-wise it would fit, but then again I don't know that it has to.

I did, well I said a vig should almost never kill night one. And Vette was an extremely odd choice at that. IF Baal is a vig he obviously didn't listen to me.

I might believe Baal not listening after the other round where he thought prof told him to be scummier, but last game the night one kill came up when I was SK so I'd think he would have noticed to not kill night one as a vig.

I also did say to not kill night one as vig, so either he's not vig, or he picks and chooses what to listen to (with a bad track record, so far).

It's also possible that he just really wanted to prove Linkz wrong OR he could be a mandatory vigilante, forced to kill every night.



I still don't understand this competition.



Linkzmax said:
A Bad Clown said:

Obviously Linkz wasn't the one who targeted me if he's still voting for me, I still was able to use my role (to see someone targeted me) so I wasn't role blocked.

This sounds like you're claiming a role that I've seen elsewhere called a Psychic, which knows if someone visits them. It's confirmable because you can't make up someone visiting you or eventually you'd be caught in the lie. And it would be the most horrible scum role ever as it basically outs any town powers, so despite your horrendous play day one I'm buying you as town.

Unvote

I'm not pyshic, I just get random info. This night I got who targeted me, I was hoping for info on another player.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
theprof00 said:

I also did say to not kill night one as vig, so either he's not vig, or he picks and chooses what to listen to (with a bad track record, so far).

It's also possible that he just really wanted to prove Linkz wrong OR he could be a mandatory vigilante, forced to kill every night.

That you did. I went back through the thread and saw it mentioned 4 times(thrice by me including the one direct reply to Baal) and joked about by Heph in relation to Vette.

Proving me wrong is a very stupid thing to do, because it's just not a good move if trying to win as town. Additionally, questioning why I was so adamant that there wasn't an SK shows a lack of thinking about balance if he's actually a vig. Vig SK Mafia will not exist in a game of 13, it's far too much killing power and makes the game barely about the lynches.

The only excuse is if it's a compulsive vig role as you suggest. I am thinking we should force Baal to claim. Whether he's vig or SK, he's a target for mafia already. If he claims vig then he won't be able to shoot tonight, which would confirm him, otherwise as SK he SHOULD(but only hat knows if it's forced) have to kill again and thus would be lynched next day. The only trouble is if he's part of the mafia team then someone else could do the kill, but to counter that we just have him claim every day.

Thoughts everyone?