It's a team game. If you're town then you just have to count on whoever is left to get it right if you die. If you never voice the suspicions then they'll have nothing to try to follow.

Good, that's the spirit.

Yes, I see that now. I've also been trying to argue against the things you've mentioned existing this round, but the way you feel(sad) isn't something that can be called wrong or right

yes the feeling can't be called wrong or right. Crazily enough wasn't even the issue though. He was saying (although he finally gets it) that the reasons I had for feeling sad were wrong. Now that is something that can be called wrong and right. My reasons for my feelings is right.

yes the feeling can't be called wrong or right. Crazily enough wasn't even the issue though. He was saying (although he finally gets it) that the reasons I had for feeling sad were wrong. Now that is something that can be called wrong and right. My reasons for my feelings is right.

I understand you're of a different mind but I don't understand the need for this remark and the sarcasm.

FYI baal is arguing with prof (yes?) on this, the opposit view has already been pointed out, so there really is no need for this mockery.

The whole point being that if you end up losing on a night kill, then a first day misslynch is costing you a day and that last day has all the information available from previous days to make the lynch descision, so it is a much more important day than the first one. The counter agrument should be that the first day info is carried to all the other days improving them and that the last day only has a possibility of happening.

It's really a matter of prefering the assurance of a little bit of info for everyday against the possibility of an extra day with the town at max info.

I hardly see how you can make a mockery of people chosing the second option.

0. Well you're barking up the wrong tree here and I certainly can't take you out, but good attempt.

1. Then drop it. I'm not the one carrying it on.

2. Your recollection of that round is waaaaay off. He was never even close to being lynched. His posting wasn't great, but he did figure out some things that nobody else was mentioning. The only question I haven't answered is why I specifically voted for prof, yet I have explained why I'm not answering that. I have answered every single other question.

3. And I did come up with reasons. I first mentioned it possibly being random after trashleg had said Heph and my votes were random, when they were clearly not. Then I asked you if it was to cause discussion because you yourself said that was your intention.

Blam! Postals up to and including this post:(You're not getting my notes though)

1. to be fair, with the mindset of you being a scum trying to out roles, your "i'm sad" response is a rather weak explanation.

2. That and a lot of your posts are confused in structure, which appears as rambling as links pointed out. (you calling stupid someone who tries to follow them also will not help them understand or make the effort to decypher your prose)

3. what I get from your exchange with prof is that you're your usual self, arguing to no end when you think your point is correct, while I don't get a side read on proff  (he's been hard to track the past few games with his softer touch).

1. seems like a scum mindset to me

2. Then people should ask me to clarify. Also I pointed out my own ramblings linkz just agreed. I called him stupid because it was prof being stupid. :P

3. not just thinking I was right :P