One more thing to answer. So far by far my biggest suspect of the game is you for your whole voting of prof. You may have said why you voted but you didn't say why prof and you took a while to do that. Then you use the answering why you voted as a way of trying to say the case is closed.

Then there is the way you are going after ABC. You know he is one who doesn't post that clearly makes slip ups and easily looks bad. So if you were scum you would know he would be an easy person to focus on get him tongue tied and voted out day one.

There is also the fact that you admitted to not understanding my vote for vett. Considering he was the only player who didn't post a thing at the time of my vote it was pretty obvious especially for one who usually keeps potals now if you aren't keeping them this game I could understand but you not keeping them is not something that looks very good for you when you have kept them so often as town.

Next up for people I suspect would be prof for trying to call a reason for a feeling a contradiction while making several of them or very illogical statements in that same post.

Then we would have the early no lynch votters. There were at least 3 in less than 100 post of the game. stan ball and the new hat.

Then we have ABC for his unfollowable  logic(. Bizzar explanations and unanswered questions. I could see him also being a fellow scum of linkz and getting pissed that linkz is trying to take him out day one

After that we have those who have either not posted as much or not posted things that really got my attention.So considering I should put my vote where my suspcions are

Unvote

Vote: Linkzmax

Also, NO NO NO NO NO. I wasn't responding to the first sentence "just because I say so doesn't make it true". I was responding the whole post.

Why would I respond to ONE sentence with my first sentence? Without even bolding it, no less. You are completely wrong.

One more thing to answer. So far by far my biggest suspect of the game is you for your whole voting of prof. You may have said why you voted but you didn't say why prof and you took a while to do that. Then you use the answering why you voted as a way of trying to say the case is closed.

Then there is the way you are going after ABC. You know he is one who doesn't post that clearly makes slip ups and easily looks bad. So if you were scum you would know he would be an easy person to focus on get him tongue tied and voted out day one.

There is also the fact that you admitted to not understanding my vote for vett. Considering he was the only player who didn't post a thing at the time of my vote it was pretty obvious especially for one who usually keeps potals now if you aren't keeping them this game I could understand but you not keeping them is not something that looks very good for you when you have kept them so often as town.

Next up for people I suspect would be prof for trying to call a reason for a feeling a contradiction while making several of them or very illogical statements in that same post.

Then we would have the early no lynch votters. There were at least 3 in less than 100 post of the game. stan ball and the new hat.

Then we have ABC for his unfollowable  logic(. Bizzar explanations and unanswered questions. I could see him also being a fellow scum of linkz and getting pissed that linkz is trying to take him out day one

After that we have those who have either not posted as much or not posted things that really got my attention.So considering I should put my vote where my suspcions are

Unvote

Vote: Linkzmax

Also, NO NO NO NO NO. I wasn't responding to the first sentence "just because I say so doesn't make it true". I was responding the whole post.

Why would I respond to ONE sentence with my first sentence?

Okay, I have the perfect plan! We no lynch today, and when there's only 1 night kill everyone can finally believe there's no SK. Then we'll no lynch for another 5 days and get things started when it's down to 4 townies vs 3 mafia.(Golden rule, but 2 is too few. 4 is possible but town would likely be quite powered then) /sarcasm

are you serious that you think linkz (as scum buddies) would take out ABC ON DAY 1!!!?

And that ABC would be pissy about that?

I completely and whole-heartedly disagree.

I should have specified, but I meant that since there's no danger of a modkill now everyone should be getting to work on lynching someone or ending the day with no lynch. I already laid out my plans for the day: vote stays on ABC, hoping others will see him as scummy also and vote with me, otherwise I'll lay out a prof-like(but not quoting all 48 of his posts) wall with everything bad from him. Since there hasn't been any movement on the lynch and the deadline will be coming while I likely won't be able to post, that wall will be incoming.

go back to the post where I first answer your question of why it made me sad. Did I have more than one reason? Oh, yes I did. Was one of them how they have more luck? Why yes, it was, Now would any other roll screwing things up like bussing and role blocking fit into that? Yes. So the best you can complain about is the number I chose to put that part of the answer in.

I don't care about your response to me. You initially said differently. I used your response as the contradiction.

jeez louise

I done with this. You are so ..stubborn, and it's distracting me.