A Bad Clown said:
|
you know that was meerely 10 posts before your own...
your playstyle is really peculiar ^^
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
A Bad Clown said:
|
you know that was meerely 10 posts before your own...
your playstyle is really peculiar ^^
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
Final-Fan said:
I don't think the votes have changed since this post. I looked it up cuz I was curious and it was far enough back that I figured a repost was warranted. |
i believe it's still the same totals, 20 hours later ^^
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
i'll be gone 3 hours before time limit ends.
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
theprof00 said: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4014861 |
2. there is always going to be skill and work, but that doesn't make them free of luck. I'm never going to agree with you on this one.
3. the story is that I'm sad because of him thinking it's not a vanilla game. The fact you are trying to turn a more detailed explanation into a contradiction is troubling. You are smart enough to know the difference, yet your are trying to use is as evidence. But in case you don't here is a simple lesson. Lets take a look at your point one.
1. You are saying not true to me agreeing with you that him saying something doesn't make it so. That is a contradiction. First you said it. Then you said it wasn't when I agreed with it. Something is then something is not.
Now for an example on more detailed explanation. What I gave was some possibilities that seemed likely to me that would be the case for heph to say what he said and thus make me sad. That was giving you more detail. Now if your that's not true was directed at this instead of the first part of the post it would still be wrong in addition to making no sense. You can say they are bad reasons to be sad, or unlikely possibilities but calling them wrong and disagreeing makes no sense because they are the reasons that I felt the way I did.
So since it's hard for me to think that you are stupid I'm thinking you're more likely scum
Linkzmax said: 1. If he's scum,(plain goon or power) you should be happy as town because that implication could be later used as evidence against him. There are plenty of good players, which doesn't put Heph at the top of the list. If he is town,(and btw I should state that I lean scum on him) then implying he is power while only vanilla means he's higher on the target list for a kill(or possible roleblock) which leaves the actual town powers able to do their thing.
3. You shouldn't be worried about being taken out by a jester. A bomb is more something a mafiasi would worry about. I don't care to look up a super saint. A godfather is a perfectly good counter to a cop, and brings the game back to reasoning rather than relying on night actions, which you seem to want. |
I'll focus on these two for now
1. If he's scum I wouldn't be happy because I've seen him get away with it and going after him once helped get me killed. Plenty of good players maybe but if scum have to make a decision between good players I'm sure they would go towards one who they think has a role.
3. With the jester not being taken out but loosing because he wins. I think there are also mafia bombs maybe not. You might not care but the super saint is someone who kills the person who hammers them, would rather not have that in the game. A godfather is one thing. Last game had 4! In addition to there being 2 cults that could make it so that someone scanned could then have their alignment change. I'm not bitter. Oh wait I am. That wasn't going to be something where reasoning could have me win. That was if I got lucky and got into a cult or got lucky and both cults got wiped out.
I'm ok with balanced that make more reasoning needed. I would have loved to have been a mason in noname's game. Heck even a mason in hephs game would have been better than being the doomed cop.
I think I'm rambling aren't I
Linkzmax said:
Nevermind, remembered the religious stuff. Still, I hope you can pop in with some thoughts and place a vote. |
I voted a long time ago and I don't recall even unvoting. I think it's just that the votals are wrong.
Wonktonodi said:
|
even should be ever
Wonktonodi said:
I'll focus on these two for now 1. If he's scum I wouldn't be happy because I've seen him get away with it and going after him once helped get me killed. Plenty of good players maybe but if scum have to make a decision between good players I'm sure they would go towards one who they think has a role. 3. With the jester not being taken out but loosing because he wins. I think there are also mafia bombs maybe not. You might not care but the super saint is someone who kills the person who hammers them, would rather not have that in the game. A godfather is one thing. Last game had 4! In addition to there being 2 cults that could make it so that someone scanned could then have their alignment change. I'm not bitter. Oh wait I am. That wasn't going to be something where reasoning could have me win. That was if I got lucky and got into a cult or got lucky and both cults got wiped out. I'm ok with balanced that make more reasoning needed. I would have loved to have been a mason in noname's game. Heck even a mason in hephs game would have been better than being the doomed cop. I think I'm rambling aren't I |
it was fun as part of one of the two... and it was a speed game (like 10 days, this day one would be 70% of it) :p
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
Hephaestos said:
it was fun as part of one of the two... and it was a speed game (like 10 days, this day one would be 70% of it) :p |
oh yeah I hated that too! super short days even less time for skill so that is a plus for this game :D
but imagine if you had to be a doomed cop for a month or so before realizing it! =D
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO