Whoa, that's a lot of fluff. I'll ignore the possible softclaim and riddle as I simply don't care about it.
So you never actually wanted Wonk to hang?
Whoa, that's a lot of fluff. I'll ignore the possible softclaim and riddle as I simply don't care about it.
So you never actually wanted Wonk to hang?
oh yeah.... i'm gonna be on Iphone 3G over the weekend (friday evening till monday morning), so I doubt i'll be able to post (last I checked I could'nt post, but I could PM with my Iphone).... Just saying ^^
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
Linkzmax said: Whoa, that's a lot of fluff. I'll ignore the possible softclaim and riddle as I simply don't care about it. So you never actually wanted Wonk to hang? |
umh? it's day one, I don't "want" anyone to hang yet. He's my #1 (tie with you) suspect so far.
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
Okay, just so I have this straight. The vote wasn't serious, which you are reinforcing by saying you didn't want him lynched? Why then did you include a serious accusation?
I am along the same lines Linkz - what's the point of the vote if it wasn't serious. And was that a riddle? Because I personally thought it was a load of waffle.
What I personally find baffling linkz is how active you are this game, last game you posted rarely and didn't do so untill prompted by Hatmoza(?) I think, not sure who exactly. I am liking the activity but the constant questioning and pouncing on even the tiniest details does seem suspicious to me.
And yes I am aware you got SK'd the first night last game, but you barely poste during the first day anyway, in comparison with today.
Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.
Linkzmax said: Okay, just so I have this straight. The vote wasn't serious, which you are reinforcing by saying you didn't want him lynched? Why then did you include a serious accusation? |
why are you putting words in my mouth?
the vote was serious but I thought a HoS was more appropriate considering the early hours (that and Wonk has reacted in improper to my vote as town in the past so it's not necessarely the appropriate presure method on him).
I'm not saying "I didn't want him lynched", i'm saying it's day one and there's no reason that seem to me as warranting a lynch on anyone yet, even more so a couple 100 of posts ago.
You'd prefer me to HoS the people I didn't have a serious accusation of?
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
Hephaestos said:
the vote was serious but I thought a HoS was more appropriate considering the early hours (that and Wonk has reacted in improper to my vote as town in the past so it's not necessarely the appropriate presure method on him). I'm not saying "I didn't want him lynched", i'm saying it's day one and there's no reason that seem to me as warranting a lynch on anyone yet, even more so a couple 100 of posts ago. You'd prefer me to HoS the people I didn't have a serious accusation of? |
Hey I don't really want to lynch anyone on the first day either, with a possibility of modkill looming over us as well(sorry if this was clarified and I missed it), but that vote did seem a little hasty, and a few posts later you retracted it back to HoS, that is kinda suspicious, I would have thought that votes have to be thought out rather than made hastily on few assumptions that you have gathered during the first day. Good to see that you've changed your mind in the end, instead of voting outright, but the jump that you've made, past the FoS and HoS is still kinda suspicious.
Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.
NotStan said:
Hey I don't really want to lynch anyone on the first day either, with a possibility of modkill looming over us as well(sorry if this was clarified and I missed it), but that vote did seem a little hasty, and a few posts later you retracted it back to HoS, that is kinda suspicious, I would have thought that votes have to be thought out rather than made hastily on few assumptions that you have gathered during the first day. Good to see that you've changed your mind in the end, instead of voting outright, but the jump that you've made, past the FoS and HoS is still kinda suspicious. |
so me voting fast is suspicious cause I didn't hos before, but me downgrading quickly to a Hos is even more suspicious... because?
if I had left it as a vote you wouldn't be saying anything. Your logic here doesn't make sense. You only find this suspicious because Linkz said it was. Since when is jumping over FoS and HoS suspicious? people do it all the time, and if you recall the round you were mafia with Dsister, I got on his tail for very similar reasons to the ones I got on wonk's tail here. Dsister put up a question so people would be easy lynch target, Wonk put up a question so that people would reveal they had a role, both serve the scum much more than the town and can warrant without doubt a Vote directly.
FoS NotStan for bandwagonning ideas, try to make them his own and not even gasp the logic behind it. This is akin to ask people to think for you in my eyes (though more meritfull if successfull).
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
Hephaestos said:
so me voting fast is suspicious cause I didn't hos before, but me downgrading quickly to a Hos is even more suspicious... because? if I had left it as a vote you wouldn't be saying anything. Your logic here doesn't make sense. You only find this suspicious because Linkz said it was. Since when is jumping over FoS and HoS suspicious? people do it all the time, and if you recall the round you were mafia with Dsister, I got on his tail for very similar reasons to the ones I got on wonk's tail here. Dsister put up a question so people would be easy lynch target, Wonk put up a question so that people would reveal they had a role, both serve the scum much more than the town and can warrant without doubt a Vote directly. FoS NotStan for bandwagonning ideas, try to make them his own and not even gasp the logic behind it. This is akin to ask people to think for you in my eyes (though more meritfull if successfull). |
What? No I found it suspicious before, the fact that you voted without actually much evidence to go on. I could vote for every member on here then unvote and at the end of the game claim "See I told you he was anti town". I presented you my idea, you seem to be getting mighty defensive about it now.
Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.
NotStan said: What? No I found it suspicious before, the fact that you voted without actually much evidence to go on. I could vote for every member on here then unvote and at the end of the game claim "See I told you he was anti town". I presented you my idea, you seem to be getting mighty defensive about it now. |
no evidence? you mean openly calling power roles out is not much as far as evidence? Maybe you'd prefer finding a knife in his hand cause the target spray paint isn't obvious enough? Please tell me Stan, what would you refer to as good evidence on day one?
Also, if my vote was so suspicious, why didn't you say something when I posted this (without explanation or evidence apparently):
Hephaestos said:
Vote: Wonk for insisting on knowing if it's a vanilla game (hey do YOU have a role, sir? cause if you do then tell us and it's not vanilla, 'but me (wonk) and my scumbudies will kill you at night, cause you're probably the doc or cop'). Hey i'll be nice, to get the game started. I highly doubt it is a vanilla game. |
And Stan you're the one being defensive here, you're even trying to turn my actions to ridicule to change the subject ("See I told you he was scum...blah blah").
Your last sentence is exactly what i'm putting my finger on, it's not your ideas that you presented but Linkz's, you are meerly trying to expand on them, yet since you don't know his full thought process you're attacking points that are completely valid.
Since when I pointed my finger at the smoke you pulled the fire alarm, I believe an nice upgrade is warranted.
HoS NotStan
oh and for good measure stinky ToS Linkz
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO