http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4014904 - Quoting hat once again: "If someone nameclaims, they only forfeit their next chance to use the ability (if any). Not throughout the whole game."

I could be wrong but my interpretation is even a limited shot role would only use the chance to use their ability, but it would not count against them.

Baal's entire claim goes against everything that's been said by the mod. I'm thinking he's mafia and slipped by saying the burn kill wasn't mafia since he knew that. He didn't want to accept the claims of Firefighter or Pyschiatrist offered because someone could actually have either role.

And as to your "?" post Heph. When you say that your vote carries a lot of pressure on the receiver I interpret that as you are a double voter. I'm obviously not asking you to confirm with words as that would cause you to lose the ability to do so if you hadn't already on a previous day due to the hint. I see no reason not to confirm you through the lynch, because as I said in the dead thread last round, a double voter isn't any more knowledgeable than a vanilla townie, and thus doubly liable to mislynch as they are to get it right. Meaning it shouldn't paint a bullseye on you.

It's possible hat meant UnNightkillable by Bulletproof, but I'd believe a single-use shot from mafia also.

I questioned all the players on prof because I wanted one player's answer on prof.

"mauling" is essentialy beating up or scratching. It is a fun fact, but it's certainly just a coincidence.

The only role town has to worry about Wonk actually having been is Cop. With trash flipping miller it means(barring a mindfuck by hat) that one exists and if Wonk was it, then mafia could fakeclaim it. It's quite risky depending on how the janitor worked, because if only prof was told Wonk's role, then his scummates shouldn't know the information.

Yeah I also disagree about limited use abilities missing a use when they get stopped by hat for a night. 

leatherhat missed the OP update, suspicious especially when people have been discussing prof's scum flip as fact for a while now. 

I'd expect "bulletproof" to simply mean resistant to one nightkill, but I don't have any justification other than gut feeling. 

prof voting baal yesterday may seem to clear him, but on the other hand prof did that when there wasn't much chance of him actually being lynched IIRC, which can be a scum tactic for disassociating with other scum.  So right now I'm considering it inconclusive, however I may unvote later. 

I am not impressed by TOS's defense, but I'm not prepared to vote him yet. 

I am not impressed by stefl, period. 

I would be pretty damn surprised if Wonk was the cop, and I would be EXTREMELY surprised if the information was sent to the entire mafia and not just the janitor. 

Let me guess... that one player was me?

Possibly.

Seriously, guilty conscience much?

Well I thought you would ask me specificaly about it, not everyone, only me. I was quite surprised when you asked everyone... and I tried to answer to satisfy you... well its not like I haven't told you what I was thinking at that time, it was just disturbing that I had the same opinion as you... so I thought about lying... which I did not do in the end...but no I don't have a guilty conscience

I don't believe that Wonk was the SK... he would have given up his night kill if he claimed, but considering that if he thought he was going to die anyway why shouldn't he claim, a further kill wouldn't bring him any profit, the only ones that could be profiting from it, where town or mafia... well okay there could have been a poison doc...