By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - No Monster Hunter 3DS?

zgamer5 on 14 April 2011
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
megaman79 said:
zgamer5 said:
megaman79 said:
psrock said:
megaman79 said:
Cross-X said:

Well guess rumors were fake as shit then...


Hold on, Nintendo already got Capcom to make MH3 on Wii, a system which is notorious for not supporting traditional core games, so what the hell makes you think a system with Resident Evil, MGS, SSF4, Zelda Ocarina and Starfox 64 remakes, ISN'T going to get Monster Hunter 3 Freedom, OR a brand new version?

When Capcom gives you a brand new Resident Evil, a brand new Mega Man action rpg and a handheld console exclusive on Street Fighter ( I said console, not phone), well frankly, its just a matter of time dude.

no, it just means you guys are never satisfied. Capcom has given the 3DS great support. 

After what 3rd parties did to the Wii you got some balls saying that.

nintendo brought that on themselves. you think 3rd parties dont want their wii games to be hits?


Well since they made every game a fucking on-rails shooter, a casual multiplayer title, or instead, put their shittiest teams on the Wii versions, they obviously should have tried harder, unless you actually expect us to fucking accept, and pay for, Dead Space: deficient edition?

If they're capable of doing SSF4 on 3DS, they were ALWAYS more than capable of creating great content on the Wii, and lets not forget MH3, probably the best 3rd party title on Wii.

why should they bust their asses to create great content if its not going to sell?

Why should it sell if they're not creating great content would be a better question to ask. There are only a handful of titles that are really comparable with HD titles when it comes to production values and marketing. Those games mainly sold well (Monster Hunter, Guitar Hero, Epic Mickey).


a dev isnt going directly to create a great game out of the bat on an untested market, hes going to great an average or good game and see how it does. do you honestly belive that good games would sell a lot more?



Being in 3rd place never felt so good

Around the Network
Chrizum on 14 April 2011
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
megaman79 said:
zgamer5 said:
megaman79 said:
psrock said:
megaman79 said:
Cross-X said:

Well guess rumors were fake as shit then...


Hold on, Nintendo already got Capcom to make MH3 on Wii, a system which is notorious for not supporting traditional core games, so what the hell makes you think a system with Resident Evil, MGS, SSF4, Zelda Ocarina and Starfox 64 remakes, ISN'T going to get Monster Hunter 3 Freedom, OR a brand new version?

When Capcom gives you a brand new Resident Evil, a brand new Mega Man action rpg and a handheld console exclusive on Street Fighter ( I said console, not phone), well frankly, its just a matter of time dude.

no, it just means you guys are never satisfied. Capcom has given the 3DS great support. 

After what 3rd parties did to the Wii you got some balls saying that.

nintendo brought that on themselves. you think 3rd parties dont want their wii games to be hits?


Well since they made every game a fucking on-rails shooter, a casual multiplayer title, or instead, put their shittiest teams on the Wii versions, they obviously should have tried harder, unless you actually expect us to fucking accept, and pay for, Dead Space: deficient edition?

If they're capable of doing SSF4 on 3DS, they were ALWAYS more than capable of creating great content on the Wii, and lets not forget MH3, probably the best 3rd party title on Wii.

why should they bust their asses to create great content if its not going to sell?

Why should it sell if they're not creating great content would be a better question to ask. There are only a handful of titles that are really comparable with HD titles when it comes to production values and marketing. Those games mainly sold well (Monster Hunter, Guitar Hero, Epic Mickey).


a dev isnt going directly to create a great game, hes going to great an average or good game and see how it does. do you honestly belive that good games would sell a lot more?

Ah heck you're right. Good things sell like shit. That must be why the PS3 is in last place, because the console is so great, unlike the Wii which is a horrible piece of crap.



kitler53 on 14 April 2011

didn't another psp monster hunter just get announced?  maybe the rumor was off a bit.



Doobie_wop on 14 April 2011
Albion said:

Dont worrie Chrizum, its no use sony Flameboy's are out in force in the last 2 day's dont feed them.  Its imposible to have a meaningfull thread conversation till they leave.

 

The hole internet forrums is just a massive Sony fanboy flamefest ATM.   Just ignore them.

You should probably avoid calling people Sony fanboys, making a legitimate argument that goes against your opinion does not make that person a fanboy. 



Bet with Conegamer and AussieGecko that the PS3 will have more exclusives in 2011 than the Wii or 360... or something.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

zgamer5 on 14 April 2011
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
megaman79 said:
zgamer5 said:
megaman79 said:
psrock said:
megaman79 said:
Cross-X said:

Well guess rumors were fake as shit then...


Hold on, Nintendo already got Capcom to make MH3 on Wii, a system which is notorious for not supporting traditional core games, so what the hell makes you think a system with Resident Evil, MGS, SSF4, Zelda Ocarina and Starfox 64 remakes, ISN'T going to get Monster Hunter 3 Freedom, OR a brand new version?

When Capcom gives you a brand new Resident Evil, a brand new Mega Man action rpg and a handheld console exclusive on Street Fighter ( I said console, not phone), well frankly, its just a matter of time dude.

no, it just means you guys are never satisfied. Capcom has given the 3DS great support. 

After what 3rd parties did to the Wii you got some balls saying that.

nintendo brought that on themselves. you think 3rd parties dont want their wii games to be hits?


Well since they made every game a fucking on-rails shooter, a casual multiplayer title, or instead, put their shittiest teams on the Wii versions, they obviously should have tried harder, unless you actually expect us to fucking accept, and pay for, Dead Space: deficient edition?

If they're capable of doing SSF4 on 3DS, they were ALWAYS more than capable of creating great content on the Wii, and lets not forget MH3, probably the best 3rd party title on Wii.

why should they bust their asses to create great content if its not going to sell?

Why should it sell if they're not creating great content would be a better question to ask. There are only a handful of titles that are really comparable with HD titles when it comes to production values and marketing. Those games mainly sold well (Monster Hunter, Guitar Hero, Epic Mickey).


a dev isnt going directly to create a great game, hes going to great an average or good game and see how it does. do you honestly belive that good games would sell a lot more?

Ah heck you're right. Good things sell like shit. That must be why the PS3 is in last place, because the console is so great, unlike the Wii which is a horrible piece of crap.

wow, its funny how people are. did i say the wii is shit in any of my posts? no im just saying nintendo brought the awful 3rd party support on themselves. then i said that a 3rd party dev isnt going to create a great game on an untested platform. first hel great a good/average game then see how things go out.

now please, keep your master evaluation skills somewhere else.



Being in 3rd place never felt so good

Around the Network
Chrizum on 14 April 2011
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
megaman79 said:
zgamer5 said:
megaman79 said:
psrock said:
megaman79 said:
Cross-X said:

Well guess rumors were fake as shit then...


Hold on, Nintendo already got Capcom to make MH3 on Wii, a system which is notorious for not supporting traditional core games, so what the hell makes you think a system with Resident Evil, MGS, SSF4, Zelda Ocarina and Starfox 64 remakes, ISN'T going to get Monster Hunter 3 Freedom, OR a brand new version?

When Capcom gives you a brand new Resident Evil, a brand new Mega Man action rpg and a handheld console exclusive on Street Fighter ( I said console, not phone), well frankly, its just a matter of time dude.

no, it just means you guys are never satisfied. Capcom has given the 3DS great support. 

After what 3rd parties did to the Wii you got some balls saying that.

nintendo brought that on themselves. you think 3rd parties dont want their wii games to be hits?


Well since they made every game a fucking on-rails shooter, a casual multiplayer title, or instead, put their shittiest teams on the Wii versions, they obviously should have tried harder, unless you actually expect us to fucking accept, and pay for, Dead Space: deficient edition?

If they're capable of doing SSF4 on 3DS, they were ALWAYS more than capable of creating great content on the Wii, and lets not forget MH3, probably the best 3rd party title on Wii.

why should they bust their asses to create great content if its not going to sell?

Why should it sell if they're not creating great content would be a better question to ask. There are only a handful of titles that are really comparable with HD titles when it comes to production values and marketing. Those games mainly sold well (Monster Hunter, Guitar Hero, Epic Mickey).


a dev isnt going directly to create a great game, hes going to great an average or good game and see how it does. do you honestly belive that good games would sell a lot more?

Ah heck you're right. Good things sell like shit. That must be why the PS3 is in last place, because the console is so great, unlike the Wii which is a horrible piece of crap.

wow, its funny how people are. did i say the wii is shit in any of my posts? no im just saying nintendo brought the awful 3rd party support on themselves. then i said that a 3rd party dev isnt going to create a great game on an untested platform. first hel great a good/average game then see how things go out.

now please, keep your master evaluation skills somewhere else.

I'm not saying that you say Wii is shit. I'm just saying what you say is perfectly logical when we look at console sales. After all, if people like it, they won't buy it, whereas the things that sell the least are obviously the best things.

I'm just agreeing with you man, can't you see?



zgamer5 on 14 April 2011
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
megaman79 said:
zgamer5 said:
megaman79 said:
psrock said:
megaman79 said:
Cross-X said:

Well guess rumors were fake as shit then...


Hold on, Nintendo already got Capcom to make MH3 on Wii, a system which is notorious for not supporting traditional core games, so what the hell makes you think a system with Resident Evil, MGS, SSF4, Zelda Ocarina and Starfox 64 remakes, ISN'T going to get Monster Hunter 3 Freedom, OR a brand new version?

When Capcom gives you a brand new Resident Evil, a brand new Mega Man action rpg and a handheld console exclusive on Street Fighter ( I said console, not phone), well frankly, its just a matter of time dude.

no, it just means you guys are never satisfied. Capcom has given the 3DS great support. 

After what 3rd parties did to the Wii you got some balls saying that.

nintendo brought that on themselves. you think 3rd parties dont want their wii games to be hits?


Well since they made every game a fucking on-rails shooter, a casual multiplayer title, or instead, put their shittiest teams on the Wii versions, they obviously should have tried harder, unless you actually expect us to fucking accept, and pay for, Dead Space: deficient edition?

If they're capable of doing SSF4 on 3DS, they were ALWAYS more than capable of creating great content on the Wii, and lets not forget MH3, probably the best 3rd party title on Wii.

why should they bust their asses to create great content if its not going to sell?

Why should it sell if they're not creating great content would be a better question to ask. There are only a handful of titles that are really comparable with HD titles when it comes to production values and marketing. Those games mainly sold well (Monster Hunter, Guitar Hero, Epic Mickey).


a dev isnt going directly to create a great game, hes going to great an average or good game and see how it does. do you honestly belive that good games would sell a lot more?

Ah heck you're right. Good things sell like shit. That must be why the PS3 is in last place, because the console is so great, unlike the Wii which is a horrible piece of crap.

wow, its funny how people are. did i say the wii is shit in any of my posts? no im just saying nintendo brought the awful 3rd party support on themselves. then i said that a 3rd party dev isnt going to create a great game on an untested platform. first hel great a good/average game then see how things go out.

now please, keep your master evaluation skills somewhere else.

I'm not saying that you say Wii is shit. I'm just saying what you say is perfectly logical when we look at console sales. After all, if people like it, they won't buy it, whereas the things that sell the least are obviously the best things.

I'm just agreeing with you man, can't you see?


yes good job generalizing a question. i really dont know what to say, im wasting my time answering jokers.



Being in 3rd place never felt so good

Chrizum on 14 April 2011
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:

why should they bust their asses to create great content if its not going to sell?

Why should it sell if they're not creating great content would be a better question to ask. There are only a handful of titles that are really comparable with HD titles when it comes to production values and marketing. Those games mainly sold well (Monster Hunter, Guitar Hero, Epic Mickey).


a dev isnt going directly to create a great game, hes going to great an average or good game and see how it does. do you honestly belive that good games would sell a lot more?

Ah heck you're right. Good things sell like shit. That must be why the PS3 is in last place, because the console is so great, unlike the Wii which is a horrible piece of crap.

wow, its funny how people are. did i say the wii is shit in any of my posts? no im just saying nintendo brought the awful 3rd party support on themselves. then i said that a 3rd party dev isnt going to create a great game on an untested platform. first hel great a good/average game then see how things go out.

now please, keep your master evaluation skills somewhere else.

I'm not saying that you say Wii is shit. I'm just saying what you say is perfectly logical when we look at console sales. After all, if people like it, they won't buy it, whereas the things that sell the least are obviously the best things.

I'm just agreeing with you man, can't you see?


yes good job generalizing a question. i really dont know what to say, im wasting my time answering jokers.

Ah, so what you say is that when it comes to software sales, consumer buying habits are totally different than other products? Not sure if I can keep agreeing with you man... Please explain that one to me.



zgamer5 on 14 April 2011
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:

why should they bust their asses to create great content if its not going to sell?

Why should it sell if they're not creating great content would be a better question to ask. There are only a handful of titles that are really comparable with HD titles when it comes to production values and marketing. Those games mainly sold well (Monster Hunter, Guitar Hero, Epic Mickey).


a dev isnt going directly to create a great game, hes going to great an average or good game and see how it does. do you honestly belive that good games would sell a lot more?

Ah heck you're right. Good things sell like shit. That must be why the PS3 is in last place, because the console is so great, unlike the Wii which is a horrible piece of crap.

wow, its funny how people are. did i say the wii is shit in any of my posts? no im just saying nintendo brought the awful 3rd party support on themselves. then i said that a 3rd party dev isnt going to create a great game on an untested platform. first hel great a good/average game then see how things go out.

now please, keep your master evaluation skills somewhere else.

I'm not saying that you say Wii is shit. I'm just saying what you say is perfectly logical when we look at console sales. After all, if people like it, they won't buy it, whereas the things that sell the least are obviously the best things.

I'm just agreeing with you man, can't you see?


yes good job generalizing a question. i really dont know what to say, im wasting my time answering jokers.

Ah, so what you say is that when it comes to software sales, consumer buying habits are totally different than other products? Not sure if I can keep agreeing with you man... Please explain that one to me.


im saying that if games like red steel 2 were good their woudnt be a huge diffrence btw what it will sell and what it currently sold.



Being in 3rd place never felt so good

Chrizum on 14 April 2011
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:
Chrizum said:
zgamer5 said:

why should they bust their asses to create great content if its not going to sell?

Why should it sell if they're not creating great content would be a better question to ask. There are only a handful of titles that are really comparable with HD titles when it comes to production values and marketing. Those games mainly sold well (Monster Hunter, Guitar Hero, Epic Mickey).


a dev isnt going directly to create a great game, hes going to great an average or good game and see how it does. do you honestly belive that good games would sell a lot more?

Ah heck you're right. Good things sell like shit. That must be why the PS3 is in last place, because the console is so great, unlike the Wii which is a horrible piece of crap.

wow, its funny how people are. did i say the wii is shit in any of my posts? no im just saying nintendo brought the awful 3rd party support on themselves. then i said that a 3rd party dev isnt going to create a great game on an untested platform. first hel great a good/average game then see how things go out.

now please, keep your master evaluation skills somewhere else.

I'm not saying that you say Wii is shit. I'm just saying what you say is perfectly logical when we look at console sales. After all, if people like it, they won't buy it, whereas the things that sell the least are obviously the best things.

I'm just agreeing with you man, can't you see?


yes good job generalizing a question. i really dont know what to say, im wasting my time answering jokers.

Ah, so what you say is that when it comes to software sales, consumer buying habits are totally different than other products? Not sure if I can keep agreeing with you man... Please explain that one to me.


im saying that if games like red steel 2 were good their woudnt be a huge diffrence btw what it will sell and what it currently sold.

If the Red Steel franchise would have the same quality, production values and marketing as the Call of Duty series, the game wouldn't have better sales? You really think that?