By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Commentary: Geohot sold out “hackers” with settlement

Kantor said:

Sony hasn't really gained anything, and neither has Geohot.

Sony can only be sure that Geohot will not hack the PS3. The same does not apply to fail0verflow, who actually hacked the thing, rather than just saying it could be hacked. They have received no compensation for the damage caused.

Geohot has lost his ability to hack the PS3. He hasn't lost any money, so this isn't a loss for him.

If anything, Sony has "lost" here, because they started the case, and haven't gained anything from it.

Actually I think that Sony did win something. How many Geohotz do you think will go public with their findings on the ps3? Anonymous might have threatened Sony, but they are always hiding. They act tough, because no one knows their identity. I reckon that any other hacker who wants to mess with the ps3 will think twice before making it public. So, yeah it might have scared a lot of people.



Around the Network
noname2200 said:
superchunk said:

This really doesn't matter in any way.


Incorrect. The chance to set a precedent would be invaluable to all of our rights had Sony lost the case, minimizing the risk of similar cases breaking out in the future. Of course, looking at this judge's complete ignorance of how technology works, this may be for the best...

He meant that the outcome of this case has no long-term impact on those matters, though i agree that it could have, which is why i'm mad at Hotz for backing down, but ultimately only one consumer's right to tamper with his legally owned property was effected, and he voluntarily gave up that right in a manner in which he is actually able to do so (agreeing to a Terms of Service does NOT count, people), so we're back where we started



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.