noname2200 said:
|
He meant that the outcome of this case has no long-term impact on those matters, though i agree that it could have, which is why i'm mad at Hotz for backing down, but ultimately only one consumer's right to tamper with his legally owned property was effected, and he voluntarily gave up that right in a manner in which he is actually able to do so (agreeing to a Terms of Service does NOT count, people), so we're back where we started

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







