| yo_john117 said: Targeting children?!? Thats just said and pathetic. |
Misleading thread is misleading. There was an update in the source and the OP has conveniently decided to not update in response.
Its a strange kind of karma, coming full circle. The amount of musicians Sony has leeched off of and put into the poorhouse, something was bound to happen, just in a different channel. I do not condone hacking at all, but Sony is far from an innocent company. =D
The Carnival of Shadows - Folk Punk from Asbury Park, New Jersey
http://www.thecarnivalofshadows.com
r505Matt said:
|
And even if it were true (and it isn't) there's a difference between "x's children" and "children". Stringer is almost 70, and I'll wager that his children are adults. I think they're old enough to handle the rude emails they'd have got if anonymous were "targeting" them.
| yo_john117 said: Targeting children?!? Thats just said and pathetic. |
They are not targeting children, that was just a rumor started by foxnews because they have an agenda against wikileaks.
r505Matt said:
|
that's only because you didn't say the magic word
“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”
- George Orwell, ‘1984’
Porcupine_I said:
|
Oh, I'm sorry, I'm usually more polite than that. Will you please update the OP? =)
Well, I usually try to be more polite, obviously I fail at that sometimes -.-
Porcupine_I said:
|
If anonymous were a single person or company, the magic word would be "lawsuit".
Do people have to say please to get you to remove "information" which you know to be false? Indeed, which you know to be libel?
Kudistos Megistos said:
Do people have to say please to get you to remove "information" which you know to be false? Indeed, which you know to be libel? |
You are right, but so is he. Or at least he raises a good point, knowingly or not. If you want something from someone, even if they should want it themselves, you should be polite in asking for it, especially if you barely know the person.
r505Matt said:
Well, I usually try to be more polite, obviously I fail at that sometimes -.- |
and now i will rush and update the OP 
“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”
- George Orwell, ‘1984’
Rpruett said:
You really think 'Doxxing' is high-level? I mean you really believe that? And you link Urban Dictionary as some source of how 'high-level' it is? Literally, I don't know if there is a lower form of Internet Harrassment. It's not high level at all. It makes me think that you've never done it, have no clue how to do it and just log onto 4chan and call yourself anonymous to be a hipster. If I were to use words you might be familiar with, you seem like a complete newfag to me. I seriously LOL at you thinking getting Dox is some high-level throwdown. It's easy, it's primitive and almost definitely is less sophisticated than a DDOS attack. It's all public information for christ's sake. |
its higher-level than DDoS anyways. I mean a DDoS is easier to setup than afinding the information on someone.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
