Oh yes, I forgot. They caused some trouble to a two-bit security firm, who were engaging in the same childish behaviour as anonymous themselves, because someone was so retarded that he set his password as "1234".

Yeah, I'm still not convinced that they're anything to worry about.

You also support going to war with Israel, IIRC. I'll justcount this as another black mark against Anonymous, I guess.

No, more dropping all support for Israel. Going to war is pointless when so many others would if they had no US backing.

  You really think 'Doxxing' is high-level?  I mean you really believe that?   And you link Urban Dictionary as some source of how 'high-level' it is?     Literally,  I don't know if there is a lower form of Internet Harrassment.  It's not high level at all. 

It makes me think that you've never done it, have no clue how to do it  and just log onto 4chan and call yourself anonymous to be a hipster.  If I were to use words you might be familiar with,  you seem like a complete newfag to me. 

I seriously LOL at you thinking getting Dox is some high-level throwdown. It's easy, it's primitive and almost definitely is less sophisticated than a DDOS attack.  It's all public information for christ's sake.

No, dude. You are on the record as wanting to see Arab nations go to war with Israel because you "don't like Israel".

They aren't stupid- even without US support Isreal would still curb stomp the middle eastern countries. Just look at the six day war.

Targeting children?!? Thats just said and pathetic.

you can't have it both way son, either your for the complete uninhibited flow of information on the internet of you're not.  as ssj12 said yesterday, "internet should be free, no enforcement at all."  either your onboard with the anon movement of you're a hypocrit ... i'm guesing you're a hypocrit.

Honestly, considering that certain fanboys were desperate enough to make Geohotz a Nazi, I'm gonna take this with a huge grain of salt, especially if these guys are denying it.

If they are doing this, though, it's downright atrocious.

Open internet does not mean no privacy. Websites would still probably want to keep their users and visitors information private. Open internet doesn't mean you could just load up anyone's facebook page and see all their information. Users would still be able to block people and keep information private, assuming Facebook doesn't want to go out of business. Free speech and privacy are very different.

I don't see what kind of connection you're trying to make between open internet and lack of privacy. If there is a connection, if anything, open internet would support privacy, since corporations like Sony would have a harder time than ever getting something like IPs of people who have visited a site. Free, open internet would mean that the law has no place there (hence the no enforcement) and subpoenaing for IPs would be useless. Then it would be up to specific websites and ISPs if they would keep their users information private, and the sites who don't might be less frequented because of it.

Before you jump to conclusions and name calling, please think things through more first. I don't care if you disagree with me and want to have a thoughtful discussion, but when you just jump in to call me a hypocrit, it just shows that you don't care to have a discussion. That makes me wonder why you're even here.