That should come to 6.9

IGN is too generous.

It's very biased compared to,

Which should get a 7.8

is it even the same reviewer? That was ages ago bro

IGN = IGN

They gave an aspect a 4, that is enough for many persons rage.

the man said with 3d turned on 2-5 hours, depending on what kind of game is playing and if the 3d is turned on thats what you get. 5 hours with 3d off and 3 with it on sounds about right, I dont know where people are going that they need to have it last more than five hours without having to stop and charge it somewhere

IGN does not equal IGN, that is retarded they have staff of dozens of different reviewers do people really expect all the reviewers to think the same and like the same things??? They dont share a hive mind.

They use IGN to represent them. They are one and the same.

^^^ yeah because they dont have the actually editors name anywhere on the page or something.... oh wait they do. 

Review policies always state "A game that was reviewed a year ago is not the same as a game reviewed today"...VGC and every other site follows that.

I think a giving system that is groundbreaking, , pioneers of glasses-less 3d entertainment,  one of a kind and can't be experienced no where else a 7.5   while giving a device that does everything a netbook does but worse and is expensive an 8.5 is a tad bit unfair.