Yeah because the console versions are going to look better then the PC version right.

Please prove me wrong then, show me some mountains, snow, ice, dark clouds, lightning, rain,  or anything like that? Fact is its taking place in a fucking city so it obviously will have only buildings. If you have played GTA you would realise the same thing. You don't need to playthrough the whole of GTA to know what its gonna have.

Me playing it through the whole is completely unrequired. Both are earthly games, not alien world. Crysis 1 actually happened in jungles and stuff a lot whereas crysis 2 is lol in the cities. So no spouting BS, if you don't know the main theme of the game you are playing then that's BS.

Oh and many people have got their hands on the console version already so don't think one can't have it now, but if you want to know it I don't have it. I don't need it either. Youtube vids and everything have already leaked, and even the ending has. 

seeing is beleiving and i wouldn't bet on it.

You are being a raving fanboy that doesn't make much sense.  You are basing all of these ridiculous comments on YOUTUBE VIDEOS.   I can't even bring myself to read your entire post.  Enjoy posting 200 posts on VGchartz a day.... I'm going to go on with my life.  Peace.  

O_o?

Whatever.

Don't be ridiculous of course they mean all consoles.

If they said best looking game on PS3, does that mean it's only the best looking game on one person's PS3.

They're talking shit anyway, it's defo not as good looking as Killzone 23. I've played the full game on the Xbox 360. The intro looks amazing - better than anything in Killzone 23, then it's all downhill from there...and quite a steep downhill too. Level design - shite, level geometry - shite, colours - overblow and over fruity - not appropriate for the setting.

Strange thing is that the intro is actually rendered in real time using the game engine...shame they couldn't pull it off for the full game.

I'm talking from the Xbox 360 version here which is noticeably better looking than the PS3 version (The Xbox 360 version doesn't run very smoothly) so the PS3 version defo aint up to KZ 23.

I haven't seen you make a valid point with reasoned analysis so far either, don't see what the O_o is for, I have played it all the way to the end and can tell you straight low res youtube videos don't do even the most pants looking game justice.

*Sigh*

So why use them to talk about graphics again? Its not me who's started this you know.

And I know youtube doesn't do justice. I can imagine how much better a game may look however, and definitely directly captured footage comes very close although its not perfect, and 720p helps.

But calling someone a fanboy because he used a youtube video to see the "art" direction of the game is very silly, just so you know.

geez...  ..this thread and all the other crysis 2 threads turned into a really sad thread people.. has the level on vgchartz really sunk that low..

*goes back playing and enjoying a game*

So the rule is now established: For a game to be the best looking, it MUST be a PS3 exclusive?   And this is JUST a PS3 exclusive, because an addendum to that rules is that it is IMPOSSIBLE for a 360 exclusive to be best looking, because the PS3 has da cell (or whatever tech you want to name), and the 360 doesn't.  Right?

dude did you go to the source where they said that, they were specifically talking about xbox.

thats why it said console, not console. it was taken out of context.

ps. i hope your avatar isnt you