By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NotStan on 17 March 2011
theprof00 said:

Right now, I'd be willing to lynch either darth or notstan.

And both because of things notstan has said. I specifically do not like notstan's FoS on vette.

 

 

@gniz

I'm kil'jaeden

Each to their own I suppose, I just FoSed in terms of "I'll be keeping a close eye on the posts" sort of thing, to see whether the theory that gniz brought up to the table was valid. Although I think that there is an off chance that it's just a theory and names are selected at random, hence why I just FoSed instead of outright voting.



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

Around the Network
Gnizmo on 17 March 2011
Hephaestos said:

Quoting this to put the radish quote into context.

He did say

the "siblings"

meaning if he was aware of it, he definitely didn't know who the townie one was.... on the other hand that would confirm Dsister as the other sibling as the info refered to is ABC saying he had something on Dsister...I don't see any other way for this sibling slip to be true. (otherwise it'd be just as I thought yesterday, confused radish). (and I can't believe proff missed the siblings text when I called radish on it...that's like 5 posts on the subject)

-> proving the siblings theory would be easy by killing Dsister (though the townie sibling would die) as if there is an evil one revealed by Radish, all points to him.

 

On the other hand, do we really need to?

With a second night kill, they are the most likely to die at night, and now with me saying this, an SK/vig/mafiaB could hit 2 birds with one stone there... and the town save a lynch...

(yeah i'm a bastard to bring this up in the open as this very likely will get dsister killed at night.... but he's on my radar and I believe the theory sound, worst case town loses a townie at night... which is expected... so it's really win win for all parties (besides mafia A)).


Onyxia has a sibiling. It was flavor text mis-interpreted I am certain. Only was Radis knew there were siblings is if he was one, and he wasn't. Anything beyond that is info we can't hope to work out. If there is a sibling in the mafia then thats one more person they have to keep alive so good on us.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

A Bad Clown on 17 March 2011
Gnizmo said:
A Bad Clown said:

Actually, some parts of gnizmo's thoery make sense. He says the lich king used to be go but turned evil later, and isn't there a mafia role for someone who can be recruited into the mafia? Like if one night the mafia targets someone they have the option of recruiting him? I read this on the mafia wiki

http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Traitor

I believe that would make sense with the lich king thing

Well you have been against the theory up until like right now. Are you suddenly a convert? It certainly would make my case stronger.

Final-Fan's character was good and he was allied with the horde right?



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
Hephaestos on 17 March 2011
Gnizmo said:
Vetteman94 said:

I wouldnt have a problem killing Darth for being a lurker but I still dont see how it would without question prove or disprove your theory.  You have had others come out claiming that alignment does not match the character.  So how would one more prove it?  


To be blunt, I think the people claiming otherwise are lying. As a rule I don't trust a thing anyone says in these games. We have 5 bits of data for, and potentially 2 against with a third on debate publicly. I am not so annoying as to accuse everyone against me of being scum so I am choosing to let it play out. If I survive long enough we have a pretty good kill list that I am comfortable seeing where it goes.

@A Bad Clown
I have less interest in the deaths of those lurkers as a whole. Yes more bits of data would help, and another night of lynchings/killings will bust or prove my theory certainly but I choose to focus on the ones most likely to help me win. It is a secondary concern for me, but still a concern.

ok got to go eat and only read up to before your post, but I have a comment for you: (unrelated to quote)

 

Linkz insist on using the names as being risky.

My conclusion:

You are right, there is a dragon mafia (they conveniently turn into humans).... but the other mafia is just cosplayers, their alignment is irrelevent to their name.

 

(for info my character is as grey as can be in wow).

 

bbl



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Baalzamon on 17 March 2011
NotStan said:

Each to their own I suppose, I just FoSed in terms of "I'll be keeping a close eye on the posts" sort of thing, to see whether the theory that gniz brought up to the table was valid. Although I think that there is an off chance that it's just a theory and names are selected at random, hence why I just FoSed instead of outright voting.

It just seems really weird when you said:

"An interesting theory but could be flawed in a sense that those names used could just be assigned randomly."

And then bam, put a FoS on somebody based on the exact theory you seemed to have doubts on?  It's just a little strange that you basically contradict yourself by putting an FoS on somebody based on a theory you think could be flawed.



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

Around the Network
theprof00 on 17 March 2011
Hephaestos said:

Quoting this to put the radish quote into context.

He did say

the "siblings"

meaning if he was aware of it, he definitely didn't know who the townie one was.... on the other hand that would confirm Dsister as the other sibling as the info refered to is ABC saying he had something on Dsister...I don't see any other way for this sibling slip to be true. (otherwise it'd be just as I thought yesterday, confused radish). (and I can't believe proff missed the siblings text when I called radish on it...that's like 5 posts on the subject)

-> proving the siblings theory would be easy by killing Dsister (though the townie sibling would die) as if there is an evil one revealed by Radish, all points to him.

 

Additionally, when ABC first says he has info, you can really read radishes fear.

"so you have info but can't reveal it"

and later, when ABC says why he can't, Radish exasperatingly agrees

"well, i guess that makes sense"

...even though it did not make any sense. Radish was obviously TRYING to agree with something he didn't understand because he was afraid of info coming out. 

I believe, NOW, that his mentioning of THE siblings was an attempt to squash ABCs evidence before it came out, except that ABC had no real evidence at all. In the case that ABC was a sibling, radish might've been able to muddy the waters. It's just an idea, but it should have been more obvious to me.



NotStan on 17 March 2011
Baalzamon said:
NotStan said:

Each to their own I suppose, I just FoSed in terms of "I'll be keeping a close eye on the posts" sort of thing, to see whether the theory that gniz brought up to the table was valid. Although I think that there is an off chance that it's just a theory and names are selected at random, hence why I just FoSed instead of outright voting.

It just seems really weird when you said:

"An interesting theory but could be flawed in a sense that those names used could just be assigned randomly."

And then bam, put a FoS on somebody based on the exact theory you seemed to have doubts on?  It's just a little strange that you basically contradict yourself by putting an FoS on somebody based on a theory you think could be flawed.

Hence why I FoS'ed instead of voting



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

A Bad Clown on 17 March 2011

The main flaw I see though in the theory is that is vetteman is possibly a traitor, then someone would have to recruit him. In World of Warcraft did any character turn the athur evil?



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
theprof00 on 17 March 2011

Can someone, anyone, anywhere, read my posts about dsis?

I feel I am making some really good posts and I haven't had one comment on either of them.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3964947

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3965024



TruckOSaurus on 17 March 2011
Gnizmo said:
TruckOSaurus said:

At this point, I think there's too many people saying alignments don't match to go along with your theory. That being said, I wouldn't mind lynching Darth for his lurker status and the arkwark timing of his roleclaim. He could have very well made it because he figured we'd think a Mafia wouldn't dare make such a claim.


Can I assume this means yours does not match? I won't ask for anymore character reveals as it spoils the mystery, but I would like bits of data. Not so many have come against that they couldn't all be scum, but the game will be really fucking boring if so cause they would all of them certainly. wowwiki.com should give you the answers. All of my work has been from memory so you might be able to spot things I missed, or have progressed since I last played a Warcraft game.

On the contrary it does match but I'm having problems believing 3 or 4 Mafia players would have come forward and said "I don't match" when they knew they'd fall under suspicion of the town. Especially considering most nameclaims were done after you exposed your theory of matched alignments.



Signature goes here!