Did I miss something? I never saw Gnizmo saying Vetteman was a likely target, he's been pretty focused on Darth since the beginning of the day.

Anyone consider that someone's using the Sibling theory to detract from another role? I'd think a vigialante or serial killer would be more likely than a powerful town with a mafia goon, if siblings are supposed to know about eachother I doubt radish would have taken his out so fast.

I think he's saying that because of the character alignment theory vetteman seems likely to be bad, because he claimed he is lich king

He said he was Arthas Menethil -

"Despite his promising beginnings, Arthas became one of the most powerful and evil beings Azeroth would ever know. Taking up the cursed runeblade Frostmourne, he became a death knight, led the Scourge in destroying Lordaeron, and merged with the Lich King."

A quick google search yielded me that result, I haven't really played WoW since the beginning days, so my memory is a tad bit rusty in regards to the names and character allignment, hence why I had to use google. And I just said that going by his theory of character allignment. Again just a guess, can't really rule it out either

Not entirely, but I am willing to back off for now. Not enough people have come out in support of it. I am still in favor of lynching Darth as a lurker which would without question prove or disprove my theory. If more people want to come out saying its a good one then I am willing to pursue it to the end though. Of course I am the paranoid sort who fears people lying to me.

Don't rule out other players like dsister or outlaw who haven't been as active as usual, vgchartz says dsister was on 9 minutes ago according to vgchartz and I don't think he's posted recently. Outlaw did saw that he would be still busy this week and has been on in 11 hours. You'd need some more confirmations that the roles are random from other players like them, you should try to get their attention.

edit: typo in middle

Yea, my name defiantly matches my role, and I'm thinking the ones who say otherwise could either be lying, or they don't know the full history behind the person.

I wouldnt have a problem killing Darth for being a lurker but I still dont see how it would without question prove or disprove your theory.  You have had others come out claiming that alignment does not match the character.  So how would one more prove it?  

Also, regarding the two family theory vs SK theory;

Dsis' confusion:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3959412

"*shrugs* 
That just falls short of the two lynch rule. Some mods just like to play outside the box I guess."

This post shows a genuine confusion. He notes that 3 mafia out of 11 in the last game falls just short of the 2 lynch rule,
but then doesn't use that to support the 2 lynch rule this game. Logically, he should have made the connection that it would be similar, and thusly emphasized 4 or 5 mafia. But he restates in a post to MG after this one by reaffirming the 20% rule; 3 mafia.

Dsis replies to it by saying, "Not to sound like I'm defending the guy but he thought it was a 30% rule.  So that would put the mark right at 5 mafia members. That's also in between the two lynch rule and the 20% rule"

This underlined bit regarding MG's idea comes off as dsis refuting a 30% rule. As in, "In MG's defense, he simply thought wrong". Though it's possible to interpret this quote as him believing MG to the extent that it reflects his own ideas, he specifically refutes MG's idea in a previous post. 

And later, in a post to me, he reiterates that 20% is most common.

Well Im not lying and I have already gotten the full history rundown on my character.  So what do you think about that?