theprof00 said:
Baalzamon said:
1) Prof puts out an HoS on Wonk. Vette thinks MetalGear is a good target for next mafia since NotStan put that name out there. Wonk puts out a vote on prof for his reaction to dsis being scum.
2) Notable: Something that has come to my mind. Outlaw seemed to vaguely make it known that Wonk was protected by hatmoza, and Wonk seems to want to play along with this theory. If this did indeed happen, it would mean that dsister targeted Wonk, meaning he couldn’t possibly be a member of the mafia. So I just thought I’d ask…what are the odds that outlaw and wonk are working together with this, outlaw acting like somebody who can see actions, when he is in fact a mafia. Outlaw then uses this knowledge to protect Wonk, who is potentially another mafia member. This is just an idea, and while it seems far stretched, it would be a pretty genius plan if they did implement it. Also thought I would mention that outlaw claims this choice was random.org’d, so take out of that what you wish.
3) Prof puts an HoS on trucks for this plus some evidence ABC put against trucks. Prof eventually says the following:
4) “An absence of evidence sometimes implies purposeful omission of said evidence”. The reason I mention this is then prof goes on to provide a “mountain” of evidence against trucks…just seems like a rather large change…accusing of mafia based on lack of evidence goes to accusing of mafia based on loads of evidence.
5)Prof unvotes and puts a vote on trucks returning suspicion with accusation for a second time. Eventually, after trucks keeps pushing a question on prof, prof decides to chronicle trucks posts, saying there is mountains of evidence against him.
6) Something that I just noticed (and made a post of) is that prof mentions how MetalGear finally agrees with lynching lurkers, despite previously believing they are just as likely to be town. So what is to stop MetalGear from saying this simply as a mafia so he can get lurking townies voted out? ABC becomes cautious of prof for his push, and puts a vote on him. ABC asks why he isn’t being targeted anymore. ABC unvotes, says he will vote tonight. Outlaw says he will be voting after my summary.
|
Hey, Baal.
I just wanted to say how much I enjoy your recaps. They are very concise and legible and just so durn convenient. Thank you.
Now, here are 6 comments based on the 6 issues I have with the outline.
1)I HoSed wonk for what I saw as wanting to be the mafia target. Also, wonk had three reasons IIRC to go after me. I think my reaction to dsis was a minor reason out of the three.
2) Town watcher is, nearly 99% of the time, coupled with town tracker. I've never seen them independently of the other. As such, in a game where a watcher is present, it is near suicide for a mafia to fake-claim tracker, as it's very very likely that there is a town tracker. He would have to have balls of steel, and with all his cryptic-ness, I don't think that is the case :P
3) I HOSed trucks for his vote on abc as well as those other reasons IIRC
4) I said that quote in response to Outlaw. Outlaw said he didn't see any evidence pointing toward guilt. I was pointing out that that in itself was evidence. I believe there was evidence, but I can also understand that other people have differing points of view/criteria for what is evidence. In teh case that he has a higher threshhold for what evidence should constitute, the fact that trucks doesn't have any, could be as good an indicator as any.
5) That line should say "FOR returning suspicion with accusation". As it says now, it looks like you're saying that I was returning suspicion for accusation.
6) Somewhere in this thread, there is a post that says something like, "MG said he let someone borrow his laptop". Normally, this is not an issue. However, this quote was said BEFORE MG actually said anything about it in the thread. Therefore, whoever said this quote has insider contact with MG. It doesn't make them automatically mafia, as it could come from wall-to-wall convo's or PMs, but it was something that caught my eye. I truly forget where I saw it, and I seemed to have lost it since realizing it later, but I believe it does exist, so I will try and hunt it down.
|