Enough of you righteousness.

You can't say scum will never do something and expect me to believe you actually believe it.

You haven't made that strong a case against Trucks.

If your big evidence is that he acts one way to scum but has treated everyone else differently how would that work if MG was scum? Or anyone else as well as him?

If you wanted MG lynched so much why didn't you make the case when I had said I was willing for either him or Mg just didn't want to rush?

Not to mentioned I voted for you before when you were making points saying I was insisting on something when you were the only one saying it had to be a certain way.

If you think that asking questions day one about thoughts on lurkers and day one lynches is the same as discussing possibilities of the make up of the game after there has been more than one night kill where does "ranking how much you trust people" fit in?

You saying that scum don't make enemies is so wrong and seem a shallow defense since you're making plenty.

You make these long posts and then you even forget some the the points you make and ask me wth?

Now you have me riled up and that also makes me think you are scum.  Good job.

you didn't even try to prove your point. No link, no explanation. Dsis posted a link that completely made your argument look bad. You didn't try. And this is what I'm talking about ABC.

You see things, but have no idea what to do after that. That's good though, you have the gift for sight. But until you become capable of proving it concisely and effectively, you are a nub.

I'll point out also, that what you've been doing, (bringing up how you so-called went after dsis first) you've been undermining my argument. And you must get upset yourself when you see something, and nobody follows, right?

Well think about the effort I put in, easily shown by comparing your and my efforts against dsis' pm idea, and just take a guess how upsetting it is when someone not only ignores your point, but undermines it. That is you abc. You are the enemy of yourself.

parenting!

It's not that 2 mafia factions is unlikely, but that there isn't really solid evidence to prove it (linkz said he colored them the same on purpose, and gniz' theory was based on there being role-alignment matchups.

It's really starting to look like people completely buy it. I have a problem whenever people completely buy something.

on another note, while I am still willing to lync darth, I'm also willing to lynch either ABC or notstan. On that merit, notstan has the most glaring infractions that I've seen thus far, so, I'll be changing my vote from darth.

Unvote darth
vote notstan

ABC I'm looking at mainly because earlier he made a couple posts about kil'jaeden, saying he created the lich king. When I told him that I had already claimed it, he was like, "oh well, I guess it's randomized then". It's like, "And how would you know that mister?! You shouldn't know my alignment!"

However, I've decided to vote notstan over ABC because (despite how ridiculous it is) I cannot believe that ABC would draw mafia twice in a row. (although he's a possible SK)

now enough, i'm not going to give anyone a reason to thinkn this is mafia bickering.

You're a nub and that's that. If you truly want it to take you 5 games to learn something, then so be it.

Keep undermining tells. 

I think it's safe to say that Baal is a townie. I've been rereading all his posts, and I don't get any scum vibe from him.

Despite the fact that he's been one of the most wishy-washy players I've seen in a game, and drawn more wrong conclusions than I'm comfortable with, I see these remarkable moments of clarity where that naivete seems to just disappear. It's possible that it's because he's just playing dumb as a mafia, but I'm, say, 75% confident that he is town. 

Unless he is some kind of super genius, I'm going with town.

YOU, on the other hand, have been drawing my attention recently. For better or worse, you're in my sights, Mr. Lich-King, aka mafia-godfather.

was that my accidental post in round 25? lol

Well, I'd say hold off because of a role claim. I really don't know what to do at this point. My only three suspects are all new to the game somewhat, and 2 of them aren't REALLY lurking, but are very much absent. I feel it's possible I'm making a big deal out of their "mistakes" and whatnot, but on the other hand MG is a good candidate, and so is darth. Additionally, just because he's roleblocker doesn't really clear him in my eyes, but he hasn't necessarily acted in a contradictory manner either.

I'm actually stumped.

so it's ok as long as you ignore your tells??