By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
theprof00 said:
Wonktonodi said:

I don't feel convinced on trucks by prof. There are some interesting points there but some I disagree with or at least question.

Several seem to be on trucks suspicion on metal gear. Yet prof is very sure metal gear is scum.

the ones about the days ending don't seem that strong and actually. I depreciate him holding off hammering the second day. Considering one game I would have said something but the day ended and I was then nightkilled.

 

you have no backbone, wonk.

You know, I can tell you til I'm blue in the face all the tells of scum.

Wishy washy posting, chainsaw defenses, etc etc, and you won't believe me until you actually see it.

You have no idea how hard I fought to get "lynch all lurkers" to be a valid point. MG and many others fought with me, saying they were just as likely to be townies. I also had to fight to prove my 4th voter theory. 4th voter is very often scum. This game, there have been three times a fourth vote has been made. 2 of them were scum, and one of them is trucks.

I always get argued with, and people always say, "I'm not convinced". You aren't convinced because you don't understand.

Or how about earlier this game, when I said, "people who talk about the structure of the game rather than the game itself, are usually mafia"? Do you not remember people shooting me down for that? Look who turned up scum. And look at truck's post when he defends dsis.

Look at trucks' post when he makes points against people by using the game structure, saying, "if there are 2 families, that would make sense for x to be scum".That is scum logic. Instead of analyzing the player, attack them using the structure.


I think you are scum. So I don't trust you when you call on you mafia theories.I think you have found your way to play as scum by sticking to your past theories and waited to find someone town who fit into as many of them as possible.

The whole parenting argument feels stupid to me.

To go further on you argument for him not voting to end day one. You came on and didn't end it either.

To talk about the make out of the game is important. Knowing what ideas work with what make up allow us to eliminate things the more we know. 

You are comparing structure of the game with make out of the game.

You had a wishy washy post after notstan roleclaimed. Hat called you on it and then you said again we should vote for him.

What is you scum theory of someone throwing out a new target to protect scum buddies?

What is your theory of people who stick so much to one scum then keep saying "I was right listen to me" repeatedly?

What is your theory on people who ask for lists?



Around the Network
Hephaestos said:
theprof00 said:

I'm not dumb enough to believe that you will "slip" under pressure like notstan did. Therefore, there is no reason to continue arguing the point. 

This is up to everyone else to decide if the evidence I've found warrants a vote. 

a vote probably not as I don't agree with the parenting point, but there is enough to be highly suspicious of him. (and I have my own points that I'm willing to check out by lynching him)

what are those points?



Wonktonodi said:
Hephaestos said:
theprof00 said:

I'm not dumb enough to believe that you will "slip" under pressure like notstan did. Therefore, there is no reason to continue arguing the point. 

This is up to everyone else to decide if the evidence I've found warrants a vote. 

a vote probably not as I don't agree with the parenting point, but there is enough to be highly suspicious of him. (and I have my own points that I'm willing to check out by lynching him)

what are those points?

......



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Hephaestos said:
Wonktonodi said:
Hephaestos said:
theprof00 said:

I'm not dumb enough to believe that you will "slip" under pressure like notstan did. Therefore, there is no reason to continue arguing the point. 

This is up to everyone else to decide if the evidence I've found warrants a vote. 

a vote probably not as I don't agree with the parenting point, but there is enough to be highly suspicious of him. (and I have my own points that I'm willing to check out by lynching him)

what are those points?

......

You are very odhd Heph. You answer my question of who you would rather lynch with prof. Then you not only don't vote or even give reasons but you jump on his vendedtta againts trucks.

HoS Heph



might as well put my vote back on the person I think is most likly to be scum.

UNVOTE

Vote: prof



Around the Network
Wonktonodi said:
Hephaestos said:
Wonktonodi said:
Hephaestos said:
theprof00 said:

I'm not dumb enough to believe that you will "slip" under pressure like notstan did. Therefore, there is no reason to continue arguing the point. 

This is up to everyone else to decide if the evidence I've found warrants a vote. 

a vote probably not as I don't agree with the parenting point, but there is enough to be highly suspicious of him. (and I have my own points that I'm willing to check out by lynching him)

what are those points?

......

You are very odhd Heph. You answer my question of who you would rather lynch with prof. Then you not only don't vote or even give reasons but you jump on his vendedtta againts trucks.

HoS Heph

well since no one reads my posts..... I think trucks is the sibling, that is the reason I voted for him.

As you, I disagree with parenting (he does do it, but i don't read this as a significant scum move). However,  there are some points that proff raised on trucks that are viable, and this is why I follow the truck route, they comfort my theory on siblings.

Now the reason I never voted proff is because until today he was laying low, not giving me anything to base my vote on. Today however he put himself forward and will have a lot to respond to tomorow... provided the remaining town does ask him the questions, as it seems that the discutions need pushing as we get further.

Thank you for the HoS, it means you care =)



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

I like your theory Heph, sounds like it'd be pretty fun

but I am not an sk or a sibling

anyways,

Vote:ABC

I think he is mafia, and I think he should be lynched!!



-

 

Votals
With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch.

 

[2,L-3] A Bad Clown: (Hephaestos), (Hephaestos), (Wonktonodi), (Baalzamon), TruckOSaurus, (Wonktonodi), MetalGear_94
[1,L-4] theprof00: (Wonktonodi), Wonktonodi
[1,L-4] MetalGear_94: Vetteman94, (theprof00)
[2,L-3] TruckOSaurus: theprof00, Hephaestos

Day ends in 57 hours and 5 minutes.

 



Clown iz back, for now. I do think it's a little strange that prof is playing different than he was last round as town, but I'm not sure if he just changed play styles or what.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
MetalGear_94 said:

I like your theory Heph, sounds like it'd be pretty fun

but I am not an sk or a sibling

anyways,

Vote:ABC

I think he is mafia, and I think he should be lynched!!

I find it interesting that all you did when you came back is make a comment about hephs post and make a vote. 

Why nothing about all the other info that has come forward?