-Off topic-

Metal Gear: Can you post from your Wii if you enter html mode?

/zombie

I never tried that

heph, when truck is lynched, we'll see about those trust lists.

I don't see how this is parenting, that's how I investigate, you could say I'm more of a "good cop" than a "bad cop" when it comes to asking questions to a suspect. Maybe I should be more aggresive but saying things like "I demand an answer" or "You should give us this information" just isn't me. You just have to look at the post I made for outlaw before the weekend, I said "I'd really like an answer to my question..." not "You better answer my question or else".

My post highlighted contradictions between the version NotStan presented to us and how the day played out, I wanted to know if he had something to say that would explain his behavior.

heph, when truck is lynched, we'll see about those trust lists.

After rereading some posts from Day One and Two, there's not much to get out of dsister's posts that could point to other scum. Most of his Day Two contribution is him arguing with Prof over his Heph vote from Day One.

The only thing I got out of this trip back in time is that although prof ignoring my questions and replies really rubs me the wrong way, his instance on bringing back dsister's contractions on Day Two while everybody ignored it (we were all focused on the nameclaims and roleclaims) has restored my faith in his towniness.

I'll repost my answer to prof's parenting claim maybe this time he'll reply to it:

Good morning to everyone except dsister!
Seems things got started without me last night. First order of business:

FoS: NotStan
He clearly referred to dsister as Apple (Happles) then threatened him with a knife. That's some pretty incriminating evidence.

So from the video we can figure out that A Bad Clown distracts the victim while NotStan knifes them. It seems NotStan is our biggest threat here.

WHAAAAAAT? Explanation please?

You talk a lot about how Final-Fan lies with his vote (though I don't agree with your interpretation of his voting pattern) but you left out what kind of lie you would be likely to use as a townie looking for scum. Are you talking about traps like prof's "Did you figure out Wonk was the doctor?" ploy?

I don't think a person's playstyle can be summarized by "Do you lie as town or not?". You're jumping to conclusions here.

"The road to hell is paved with good intentions" that's what comes to mind when I'm thinking about a lying townie. They start out with the best intentions (I'm gonna find scum!) but inevitably it ends up costing the town big time whether it's a mislynch or just a huge waste of time.

1) What's wrong with creating discussion? Any Day One discussion has to be "artificially created" since there's nothing to go on at that point.

2) There's goes my hopes for gambit-free prof.

The doctor just roleclaimed, that's bad for the town. :P

Seriously, the rare circumstances I mentionned in my reply to dsister involve a power role questionned about who he is but if we take your little scenario in consideration:

- If the doctor roleclaimed, it's because he was about to be lynched (or else he's an idiot)

- A doctor who can protect himself is rare and one that can do so two nights in a row is practically unheard of (on VGC at least). So someone hearing that claim could very well decide he's lying and hammer him.

Now, I know there are ways to fix your scenario so the doctor doesn't claim to have protected himself twice and still retain the benefits you mentionned but as you can see, lying is very risky business and if you forget a little detail (like above) you'll get caught and the consequences will be detrimental to the town.

Was that the super powered God of War game?

To be fair it had nothing to do with me being Mafia since I had mentionned it in the sign-up thread before I got my role.

The underlined doesn't make sense. All hatmoza said was "I'm protown", the Mafia already knows that so that doesn't put him more at risk than any other townie.

You're right when you say this kind of post is suspicious but hatmoza has a tendancy to roleclaim on Day One and I remember him making the same kind of post after getting a pro-town role after a string of scum roles (and he was really town).

You sure hopped fast on that bandwagon fast! You just made yourself more suspicious than A Bad Clown.

Even if you're the first the vote for him, you kinda jumped at the first chance to vote for A Bad Clown but, as you said, you FoSed him before (I didn't remember that) so it does make your move a little less brash that I thought.

Another point (although we're in no danger of that right now): people voting because they were bored got Wonk (the doctor) lynched last game.

Well there was a 7 hour gap between Heph's post (4:24 EST) and Gnizmo's post (11:27 EST) I'm guessing Metal_Gear's boredom comes from this lack of activity. Seems he was itching to post but needed someone to initate the day's conversation. Not too sure what this means though.

Are you done reading? Can you share some thoughts with us?

So this means you could have upgraded your FoS to a vote without having to wait for Gnizmo to voice his suspicions of him?

I don't think so, Metal_Gear's vote still bugs me a little but it's nothing that warrants a lynch.

Maybe we should lynch you instead because you'll deceive us all if you're scum (that goes for Heph too!). :P

edit: video screwed up

Why would I want to make Archimonde happy?

Also maybe some of the other players who haven't voted do have something meaningful to add to today so I'll give them the chance to speak and hammer the no lynch.