also if everyone could please finish giving me a trust-list numbered 1 to 8.
Baal, you're missing 1-6
and I'm missing trust lists for about 4 other people.
also if everyone could please finish giving me a trust-list numbered 1 to 8.
Baal, you're missing 1-6
and I'm missing trust lists for about 4 other people.
theprof00 said: also if everyone could please finish giving me a trust-list numbered 1 to 8. Baal, you're missing 1-6 and I'm missing trust lists for about 4 other people. |
Is mine okay or do you want set positions?
Signature goes here!
Yea, my day summary won't be done until at least tomorrow, if not Wednesday now. I've been slacking off in school lately because of a pretty much constant headache, so I have a bit of homework, quite a bit of studying for a test, and work this week that will be consuming pretty much all of my time. I just got the lowest score I've ever received on a quiz I had today, so especially the beginning of this week, I just won't have enough time to focus towards the end of Day 2/Day 3 review.
Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.
theprof00 said: also if everyone could please finish giving me a trust-list numbered 1 to 8. Baal, you're missing 1-6 and I'm missing trust lists for about 4 other people. |
I almost forgot about that...similar to my day summary, the earliest I would expect to have that done is Wednesday...I'm having school issues (more of a single class actually, but regardless) at the moment that I sort of want to get solved before I spend several hours going through posts again.
Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.
that's ok baal, i'm doing a potals right now, much to my chagrin.
But i do want your trust list now. You seem to be trying to put it off.
theprof00 said: that's ok baal, i'm doing a potals right now, much to my chagrin. But i do want your trust list now. You seem to be trying to put it off. |
I can do my best to have it put together by tonight, but there's no guarantees about that, as my only "open" time is when I'm scheduled to tutor, and usually I can only do other things half-ass while I'm tutoring somebody.
*Goes off to eat and do homework*
Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.
Day 3
Name C/NC/?/M/PS
Heph xxvii/xiii/v/iii/
Trucks xvi/iii/i/ii/
MG i/vi///
prof xxvi/xxiv//iv/
wonk xxiv/xii/iii//
outlaw vi/vii/i//
ABC xvii/xv//iv/
vette xii/iv/iii//
Baal vi/vi//i/
Heph votes ABC for being in the orange joke, asks about size of the dragon family, which he then answers himself, saying it's unlikely.
Trucks says he'll look at dsis' posts. In the theorizing of enemy composition, he mentions 3rd party and hurting mafia, sepcifically saying "probably 2 left".
Prof questions the night actions.
Heph says dsis might've been the random, congratulates hat and gniz for a second time.
wonk questions what outlaw did.
outlaw cryptically says he was with wonk.
ABC says "Wow" followed by "DId anyone notice his strategy of "Kill me and see what happens" on day one?" (not sure what that means. Knowing abc he could mean me as in himself, or as in dsis)
outlaw says he tracked hat.
prof comments on the kill events, making a theory that scum directly attacked hat. Also points out that notstan says he would've blocked MG on a whim. ABC asks if notstan said this before he admitted mafia, mg answers him. prof also answers.
Truck says that if they were calling hat's bluff, they'd send their weakest member.
Wonk responds to prof saying that hat could've blocked wonk.
Prof quotes hat "If the person I Guard is killed, I'm also killed but I still kill them." says they HAD to target hat.
Wonk combines the theories by prof and truck saying, "either they sent out dsis as the weakest member, or they targeted wonk".
prof points out suspicions of wonk. Specifically, wonk "wanting" to be the target.
vette agrees with prof on the notstan target.
wonk votes prof for 3 reasons. reaction to dsis flip, ignoring the SK as killer, using notstan's word to make suspicions.
vette agrees against prof's assertion, implies hat was lying about role
prof responds to wonks accusation. questions basis for first question, argues the flavor, comments on wonk's scum setup ideas. Allows for suspicion for taking scum word seriously.
Prof asks for more input before giving up his point.
Truck says that if there is a big mafia, then wonks caring about being protected points to him being a member.
Wonk agrees that the flavor is open to interpretation, also rebuts truck
Baal says MG might've been a scapegoat
Heph questions prof on who else could possibly have been the random
Vette agrees with baal, but also questions the assertion.
ABC brings up a good point that (correction) wonk had voted MG. (Keep in mind that heph and wonk had their votes previously on notstan, so it's possible he chose MG as a scapegoat who had a good chance of being lynched instead)
Baal brings up a good point to mg being a scapegoat. (still doesn't clear mg of being an sk)
prof clarifies the context of notstans remark. Stating that he would've wanted to pick someone who wasn't a townie.
wonk addresses old prof points again, saying dsis reaction felt fake, saying he wasn't insisting
wonk suspects outlaw
outlaw admits to being the random (this makes sense)
trucks makes a point giving basis to wonk's theory of outlaw being scum
Heph comments that if it were true, it would mean outlaw would have to be part of big mafia family, and not team 2, or sk
vette votes mg
prof asks for a trust list
trucks says that it looked like abc was setting up for hat's lynch today
prof points out that wonk was fosing the orange crew
prof asks why heph doesn't trust trucks
abc makes an "assertion" (that was already made by another) that outlaw isn't the tracker, says some other gibberish about dsis also being randomed.
wonk restates that outlaw would have to be scum, a point which should've been obvious to abc
Heph answers prof that trucks is canadian
wonk and heph look at abc's orange comments, heph votes abc
wonk votes abc
ABC points out that wonk,mg,and truck were involved in the orange
heph answers wonks questions, answering "who would you rather lynch" by saying prof, despite the fact that he voted for abc.
Baal votes abc and answers questions, nothing very noticeable though
Heph notes that notstan got defensive with wonk
mg says his brother took his computer (need to look up who said this before mg did)
ABC says MG is suspicious for "not wanting" to hammer abc yet.
wonk votes for time limit
Wonk asks Heph why he didn't vote me. Heph replies, "based on what". (wtf?)
heph votes time limit
prof says trucks seems to be parenting the mafia
abc makes chart with a godfather
wonk asks why godfather without cop
abc says watch/track could be the cop (doesn't make sense, abc. Doesn't support godfather theory)
wonk says, more likely, we have the combo and no godfather
ABC finds evidence supporting a lynch of trucks
trucks points suspicion to abc, votes abc
prof asks baal to unvote
wonk unvotes
baal unvotes
wonk revotes
heph points out that some scum might have non deathwing names
prof asks for trust lists again, baal putting it off til wednesday.
Prof:
outlaw
Baal
Vette
Wonk
Heph
ABC
MG
trucks
Trucks:
town;prof,baal,vette
neutral;outlaw,wonk,heph
scum; abc, mg
Heph:
Baal
Wonk
Vette
MG
Trucks
ABC
Prof
outlaw
Baal:
7)MG
8)ABC
Vette:
1)Trucks
2)prof,outlaw,baal,wonk,heph
3)Abc,mg
yay i'm on today. I don't see how helpful listing trust can be. Trust in this game can be fluid. Also I could see scum really using it to try and find the townies that most find untrustworthy and leave them around while offing ones we trust more.
Plus the ones I trust the most are the ones most likly to stab me in the back. I'll give you this though prof I don't trust you.
oops again, my list is supposed to be outlaw, then trucks.
However, I do have to change my list I suppose, because since then, I saw the parenting thing, then abc pointed out some interesting things, and I'm really shocked by trucks' revenge vote on abc.
HoS trucks.