By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Teen could be jailed for 2 years for killing pet hamster

FaRmLaNd said:

Whilst 2 years in gaol seems excessive, from my limited anecdotal experience, anyone that hurts animals without a rational reason (such as in self-defense, or if you need to eat to save your life etc), can often go on to do further terrible actions, as I think its indicative that that person has some serious issues. But hey, I'm no psychologist, so don't listen to me :P

Cruelty to animals is no laughing matter and of course the person should get some kind of punishment, but only if its supported by rehabilitation, as you don't want someone to go to gaol and get out being worse then when they entered.

 

What about eating meat? Is that acceptable? If I have the option of being a vegetarion, but I choose to eat meat because I like the taste, does that mean I'm wrong?

You say that someone hurting animals has metal issues. If they do, then they shouldn't be jailed, they should be sent to a mental institution or something.



Around the Network
Mr Puggsly said:
sapphi_snake said:
Mr Puggsly said:

No they don't. Which is why animals are inferior and we hold them to a lower standard. Their lives included.

Now I'm not for killing animals for entertainment, anger, etc. But I sure as hell don't think an animals life, especially a rodent, is worth sending someone to prision.

She should pay a fine and maybe be force to take an anger management class. But the hamster's life isn't worth ruining her life.

You may think that way, but other people don't!

Well most people probably see it my way. Now I'm gonna go eat an animal...

I'm not gonna say what I think about "most people". It's not as if what "most people" think is always the best thing to do.

(Also, there's nothing wrong with eating an animal)



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

What a bitch



 

Jay520 said:
FaRmLaNd said:

Whilst 2 years in gaol seems excessive, from my limited anecdotal experience, anyone that hurts animals without a rational reason (such as in self-defense, or if you need to eat to save your life etc), can often go on to do further terrible actions, as I think its indicative that that person has some serious issues. But hey, I'm no psychologist, so don't listen to me :P

Cruelty to animals is no laughing matter and of course the person should get some kind of punishment, but only if its supported by rehabilitation, as you don't want someone to go to gaol and get out being worse then when they entered.

 

What about eating meat? Is that acceptable? If I have the option of being a vegetarion, but I choose to eat meat because I like the taste, does that mean I'm wrong?

You say that someone hurting animals has metal issues. If they do, then they shouldn't be jailed, they should be sent to a mental institution or something.

I have no problem with people eating meat, I eat meat afterall. I worded that sentence incorrectly and I can see it implies that I think eating meat is irrational. What I meant was that anyone that hurts an animal for irrational reasons, which of course excludes things like self defense and for food has serious problems. As its hurting a living creature without any substantive reason. I will rewrite that sentence in my initial post.

Which is exactly why I said they should only be punished if its also accompanied by rehabilitation, I should think being in a mental institution and being denied freedom of movement would satisfy both of those points. Hence why I said 2 years in gaol is excessive. I honestly have no idea what the second half of your post means in relation to what I said because it seems perfectly in line with what I said.

"2 years in gaol seems excessive"

"some kind of punishment, but only if its supported by rehabilitation"

"as you don't want someone to go to gaol and get out being worse then when they entered."

I never said they had to go to gaol, I certainly would err on the side of caution and instead instigate psychological assistance, maybe some classes in ethics and some forced community work or a fine or something if it was my call. Eg, rehabilitation with some punishment that isn't excessive.



Mr Puggsly said:

Animals don't just kill for food. But would you have felt better if the woman ate the hamster?

Dogs are superior physically and that's all I'm looking at. Mentally... about the same level. They just eat, shit, and kill something for fun on occasion.

Dogs are just bigger than housecats.  Cats are far "superior" or better suited for fighting than dogs, having more agility and retractable claws.  In fact, the only advantage that dogs have over cats is that they run in a pack, but since lions do that as well it isn't that special.