If it wasnt for little deviants i would have wrote off that back panal as pure shit.

The PSP2 is nowhere near as powerful as a PS3, not even a 15. Nearer a 110.

The CPU inside the PSP2 although running at 2Ghz or around there is still nowhere near as fast as even 1 of the PS3 spu running at 2Ghz (if it were, which it isn't, it's going at 3.2Ghz). It's like the old comparison of comparing the intelAMD Ghz thing.

Go do some googling on the actual chip used and you will see, it's basically a glammed up smartphone, with a 3d card. - That is the difference, and it's a big one.

The PSPhone on the other hand is just 1 big joke, that really is just a smartphone, a modern one but by no means any faster than anything the competition is releasing at that time. (It's got that new nvidia graphics chip, which lots of other phones will have)

edit- in response the the claims of the psp2 being somewhere between a PSP1 PS3...Hmmmm, I spose that is correct and goes without saying, but it implies it's in the middle - which it definately isn't.

Think of a 12 inch penis, a 2 inch penis and a 4 inch penis :)

Although the PSP only has a 333mhz processor downclocked to 222mhz (think a couple of games unlock it to 333, but anyhow). It's a proper processor as used in a PS2 and faster than an equivalent Pentium II 400Mhz of it's time era if you get me...

So 2Ghz is 6 times 333mhz, means nothing.

Anyways, if you want some hints look up Cortex A9, which is the CPU inside the PSP2, there's a few websites out there comparing it to a high end Atom CPU!!!

Which says it all really.

So, PSP has a 2'' penis, PS3 has a 12'' penis and PSP2 will have a 4'' penis.

Does that make all male owners of Sony consoles gay?

Actually, that has nothing to do with my opinion.  I said that the 3DS so far has only proved it can pump out graphics that were a little better than the PSP, mostly better AA and shadowing from what I have seen.  This was just addressing a specific part of the discussion Maxwell and I were having.  If you think it is better because of other reasons besides graphics, than you have the right to that opinion.

@ Beuli2

I'll just ignore that post.  Either you're joking or you're not up on your gaming history.

While I'll give him that Nintendo seems to be missing a HUGE opportunity and didn't/haven't put out a Pokemon game like that found on its handhelds for its home consoles, they still didn't lack Mario games.  I don't think Mario 64 or Mario Sunshine could hardly be called a "spinoff."  Especially not Mario 64.  Heck, many proclaimed it as the shining example that games could make the transition from 2-D to 3-D, but it still didn't save the N64.  Of course, both systems still saw releases of mainline titles in Nintendo's other popular series, Legend of Zelda, Donkey Kong, Metroid and Kirby.  Then they also had a new popular series, Super Smash Bros., when contained characters from all their other franchises.

these types of statements show how little you know of the device. I suggest do a bit more research next time before posting such rubbish

don't worry about the game or the quality. If you have played games made by Sony Bend for the psp before, you should know it won't be a problem.

which leads me to my next Q...how many sony Bend games have you played on the PSP?

just because another team working on it doesn't mean the game will be bad, that's a silly way of thinking which makes me believe most of you who will whine about this have no clue about what these teams have done in the past on such devices

Then tell me what PSP games Naughty Dogg, Insomniac, Santa monica, or even an exclusive third party team like Sucker Punch.  Those are the three big teams that people see Sony, see their IPs, and attach them to Sony.  For someone so "knowledgeable" you're rather rude while not posting any examples.  

It's not even an opinion when developers can easily port over some of their PS3 and 360 titles, something they can't do on PSP cause that's downgrading past PS2 levels, Capcom put the MT Framework and had a version of Resident Evil 5 running on the 3DS and that took them all of less than a year to do since they starting getting dev kits early last year, tested MT framework, and had their Resident Evil game ready to show off by E3.

I could see the point that it's only "slightly" better than PSP if we're talking OoT remake, but that's already been proven to be one of the worst looking 3DS titles, and the DS has yet to even release in the west.