noname2200 said:
So why did you leave out the rest of the post? |
cause his points are worthless and resumed in the sentences I put in their stead.
Have you read the post?
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
noname2200 said:
So why did you leave out the rest of the post? |
cause his points are worthless and resumed in the sentences I put in their stead.
Have you read the post?
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
noname2200 said:
Then what was? I'm not sure what you're referring to by "it." Also, why do you think TruckOSaurus would try to "add spice" to the game? |
Then it was as you said it Republic, since you were a mod last round and evidently knew the rule.
(like you noname which means my sentence was understood by probably no one...).
Why wouldn't Trucks spice the game? he hasn't moded in a while (or ever) and might want to add a little vigilante or a roleblocker or double voter... one thing that makes everyone wonder at what's happening, while helping balance the game. I mean this concept shouldn't be unfamilar to you since you did massons last round as the only town power role...
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
A Bad Clown said:
I am sorry, but I can not vote due to me having 4 votes. If I were to vote, Heph could have his possible mafia buddy vote me. Thus, saving himself. |
that logic makes no sense, a mafia would not vote you to save me, they'd vote me to make sure they look townie too. If they voted you they'd paint themselves as scum and the town would hit 2 birds with one stone. Basically with me gaining vote momentum you can consider yourself saved for the day. However Proff and Linkz have cleaverly kept you on the radar by nicely putting that they expected you to be on the lynch seat again in the next few days (that was about 75 posts ago when they were sending flowers to each other at how amazing it is that they have the same targets).
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
A Bad Clown said:
Response: Thank you. I am sorry Heph, but it seems you may be a danger. It looked as if you were just being passive, but I do understand what people are talking about now. vote: Heph Statement: Now it seems unlikely for Heph to save himself and his mafia buddies, while lynching me in the proccess. |
with this however you secured your lynch tomorow, you both provided no reason, outloud said you were bandwagoning and are the 'tipping point' voter which proff will regal to explain to you how it makes you scum (but tomorow on your trail part 2, as today is useless).
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
noname2200 said: Although thinking about it, assuming you flip town anyone who rushes to save heph by voting you would make himself a strong object of suspicion, so I'm not sure this fear is particularly valid in the first place. |
yay, reasoning after action!
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
trashleg said:
no. im saying if it appeared we buddied, it wasn't me. i think the other guys had a valid reason for thinking we might be suspicious TOGETHER, even though individually we're sound. but i didnt think so at first because you were just being nice. i dont want to trust you in-game, even though i valued your real-life comments (thank you :) ~). i'm brainstorming. |
don't worry i'm not taking it bad, i'm laughing cause you're doing the best thing you possibly could be doing right now. Distancing oneself from a soon to be lynched townie is a great move whether you're town or mafia... though in one case you don't know it, in the other it's a bold move that is not often used as it does attract attention initially.
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
Hephaestos said:
don't worry i'm not taking it bad, i'm laughing cause you're doing the best thing you possibly could be doing right now. Distancing oneself from a soon to be lynched townie is a great move whether you're town or mafia... though in one case you don't know it, in the other it's a bold move that is not often used as it does attract attention initially. |
im not about to bandwagon on you, if thats what you mean. i've been saying the whole time that i have't buddied with you but it hasn't given me cause for concern. then i only stated that that COULD be your tactic. yeah im a little suspicious of you, of course i am. but my initial suspicions of ABC are more valid, i think. i dont know what you are, and i'd like to know, depending on the outcome of day one.
Hephaestos said:
with this however you secured your lynch tomorow, you both provided no reason, outloud said you were bandwagoning and are the 'tipping point' voter which proff will regal to explain to you how it makes you scum (but tomorow on your trail part 2, as today is useless). |
Statement: As you could tell, I did not want to vote you too much.
The other's have showed that it looked you were being sneaky and trying to "buddy" up.
Query: If I were not to vote you, who would I vote instead? We have no other leads, and I there's not much else I can do.
It was to vote you, or have myself wrongfully lynched.
19:44:34 | Skeezer | METAL GEAR ONLINE |
19:44:36 | Skeezer | FAILURE |
19:44:51 | ABadClown | You're right! |
19:44:55 | ABadClown | Hur hur hur |
19:45:01 | Skeezer | i meant |
19:45:04 | Skeezer | YOU ARE A FAILKURE |
19:45:08 | Skeezer | FAILURE* |
trashleg said:
i clearly said "if that was me". meaning, if i was in ABC's shoes, being considered alien scum, i wouldnt be goig about being all ambiguous. i'd be instantly trying to fix it for clarification, since the ambiguity(sp?) of what i'd said could be suspicious, especially if i went along with it so long like ABC did. that was all. (for the record of anyone else who noticed my saying that, i didnt say "if anyone thinks i say anything suspicious, il poop my pants". if you think so, i would consider my comment to have been taken out of context). |
Nobody was pressuring ABC at the time he made the ambiguous statement though. Obviously he wasn't a confirmed townie, but he wasn't considered alien scum any more than the next guy or gal.
Or do you mean once questioned about it you'd(if it were you in his shoes) have quickly tried to be very clear about it?
As for the rest of my points, thank you for responding to them. I don't totally buy your answers, but I'm not going to continue on about the same points either.
A Bad Clown said:
Statement: As you could tell, I did not want to vote you too much. The other's have showed that it looked you were being sneaky and trying to "buddy" up. Query: If I were not to vote you, who would I vote instead? We have no other leads, and I there's not much else I can do. It was to vote you, or have myself wrongfully lynched. |
well you'll see my point later i guess.
otherwise, there's always the no lynch option. i myself vote wonk but i'm not asking you to do so since evidently you weren't convinced by previous arguments on him, so it'd be pretty much the same thing as what you-re doing now.
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO