By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
noname2200 said:
Hephaestos said:

don't just spell check, also do reread what you say

1) I could be an SK because I talked about one.

2) I could be a power role but no cause I talked about one.

Very convincing points, i'm thinking of voting myself right now....

So why did you leave out the rest of the post?


cause his points are worthless and resumed in the sentences I put in their stead.

Have you read the post?



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Around the Network
noname2200 said:
Hephaestos said:
theRepublic said:
Hephaestos said:

o recall both massons and mafia being told they could talk day one last round... trucks was a masson, he might have liked the idea. Especially as this little advantage could help tweak the game to a 2 mafia other day SK rather than just 3 mafia?

Well I did think it was wierd when I read it in the quicktopics but now I wouldn't rule it out...

They were allowed a single "I'm here" type of post as Day One started.  That was it.  I see that the way I worded that post looks funny, but if you look at the timestamps, you see that there really wasn't any discusion during the Day.

That is an interesting theory that you think Trucks let them talk during Day One this game, but I think it is highly unlikely.

then it was.

and yes it is an unlikely theory, but i can see trucks trying to find ways to add spice without changing too much from vanilla, if not in this way, then in an other.

Then what was?  I'm not sure what you're referring to by "it."

Also, why do you think TruckOSaurus would try to "add spice" to the game?

Then it was as you said it Republic, since you were a mod last round and evidently knew the rule.

(like you noname which means my sentence was understood by probably no one...).

Why wouldn't Trucks spice the game? he hasn't moded in a while (or ever) and might want to add a little vigilante or a roleblocker or double voter... one thing that makes everyone wonder at what's happening, while helping balance the game. I mean this concept shouldn't be unfamilar to you since you did massons last round as the only town power role...



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

A Bad Clown said:
Wonktonodi said:

Ok haven't been on in a while and unfortunatly can't stay on for too long.  However a few things to address before I'll be back latter

@linkz IIRC I had voted for Heph before the post that I said was a possible slip not after.  I could be mistaken but if no one else checks this now I will when I get back.  Also I have asked ABC to clarify some things not sure timing and can't check that now either. I don't feel as satisfied with the answeres as I want to be, however with as many votes on him as there are I would rather focus elsewhere for now.  Mainy on Heph.  Oh my thought was maybe trucks didn't do random scum but instead made a strong team.  With him also saying we should lynch strong players, yet not saying it.  I did not think it was trying to hint at a protown role.

@nonname personnally I think I was doing more to find scum before heph than after.  Since now I'm pretty sure he's scum and want to get people to vote for him.

That's all for now be back a bit latter.


Response: Heph is starting to look that way.

I am sorry, but I can not vote due to me having 4 votes.

If I were to vote, Heph could have his possible mafia buddy vote me.

Thus, saving himself.


that logic makes no sense, a mafia would not vote you to save me, they'd vote me to make sure they look townie too. If they voted you they'd paint themselves as scum and the town would hit 2 birds with one stone. Basically with me gaining vote momentum you can consider yourself saved for the day. However Proff and Linkz have cleaverly kept you on the radar by nicely putting that they expected you to be on the lynch seat again in the next few days (that was about 75 posts ago when they were sending flowers to each other at how amazing it is that they have the same targets).



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

A Bad Clown said:
noname2200 said:
A Bad Clown said:

I am sorry, but I can not vote due to me having 4 votes.

If I were to vote, Heph could have his possible mafia buddy vote me.

?

You're still two votes away from getting hammered...

Shoot, if that's all that's stopping you,

Unvote

I may put it back on you, but now you're three votes away, so any scumbuddy of heph's won't get you to the brink.

Response: Thank you.

I am sorry Heph, but it seems you may be a danger.

It looked as if you were just being passive, but I do understand what people are talking about now.

vote: Heph

Statement: Now it seems unlikely for Heph to save himself and his mafia buddies, while lynching me in the proccess.

with this however you secured your lynch tomorow, you both provided no reason, outloud said you were bandwagoning and are the 'tipping point' voter which proff will regal to explain to you how it makes you scum (but tomorow on your trail part 2, as today is useless).



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

noname2200 said:

Although thinking about it, assuming you flip town anyone who rushes to save heph by voting you would make himself a strong object of suspicion, so I'm not sure this fear is particularly valid in the first place.

yay, reasoning after action!



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Around the Network
trashleg said:
Hephaestos said:
trashleg said:

also, im questioning myself for not wondering why Heph has been so buddyish with me. i know he was being nice, but im also wondering if there was an in-game ulterior motive. i really dont want to be keep being associated with him, especially when its been a one-sided  kind of buddying. i dont want that, whether he's alien scum or not.

-goes back to rereading thread-

lol

so first you say we don't buddy and now you say I buddy... that's low.

in any case although this post reeks, I can't see a reason for a mafia to want to distance themselves from me.

no. im saying if it appeared we buddied, it wasn't me. i think the other guys had a valid reason for thinking we might be suspicious TOGETHER, even though individually we're sound. but i didnt think so at first because you were just being nice. i dont want to trust you in-game, even though i valued your real-life comments (thank you :) ~).

i'm brainstorming.

don't worry i'm not taking it bad, i'm laughing cause you're doing the best thing you possibly could be doing right now. Distancing oneself from a soon to be lynched townie is a great move whether you're town or mafia... though in one case you don't know it, in the other it's a bold move that is not often used as it does attract attention initially.



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Hephaestos said:
trashleg said:
Hephaestos said:

lol

so first you say we don't buddy and now you say I buddy... that's low.

in any case although this post reeks, I can't see a reason for a mafia to want to distance themselves from me.

no. im saying if it appeared we buddied, it wasn't me. i think the other guys had a valid reason for thinking we might be suspicious TOGETHER, even though individually we're sound. but i didnt think so at first because you were just being nice. i dont want to trust you in-game, even though i valued your real-life comments (thank you :) ~).

i'm brainstorming.

don't worry i'm not taking it bad, i'm laughing cause you're doing the best thing you possibly could be doing right now. Distancing oneself from a soon to be lynched townie is a great move whether you're town or mafia... though in one case you don't know it, in the other it's a bold move that is not often used as it does attract attention initially.

im not about to bandwagon on you, if thats what you mean. i've been saying the whole time that i have't buddied with you but it hasn't given me cause for concern. then i only stated that that COULD be your tactic. yeah im a little suspicious of you, of course i am. but my initial suspicions of ABC are more valid, i think. i dont know what you are, and i'd like to know, depending on the outcome of day one.



Highwaystar101 said: trashleg said that if I didn't pay back the money she leant me, she would come round and break my legs... That's why people call her trashleg, because she trashes the legs of the people she loan sharks money to.
Hephaestos said:
A Bad Clown said:
noname2200 said:
A Bad Clown said:

I am sorry, but I can not vote due to me having 4 votes.

If I were to vote, Heph could have his possible mafia buddy vote me.

?

You're still two votes away from getting hammered...

Shoot, if that's all that's stopping you,

Unvote

I may put it back on you, but now you're three votes away, so any scumbuddy of heph's won't get you to the brink.

Response: Thank you.

I am sorry Heph, but it seems you may be a danger.

It looked as if you were just being passive, but I do understand what people are talking about now.

vote: Heph

Statement: Now it seems unlikely for Heph to save himself and his mafia buddies, while lynching me in the proccess.

with this however you secured your lynch tomorow, you both provided no reason, outloud said you were bandwagoning and are the 'tipping point' voter which proff will regal to explain to you how it makes you scum (but tomorow on your trail part 2, as today is useless).

Statement: As you could tell, I did not want to vote you too much.

The other's have showed that it looked you were being sneaky and trying to "buddy" up.

Query: If I were not to vote you, who would I vote instead? We have no other leads, and I there's not much else I can do.

It was to vote you, or have myself wrongfully lynched.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
trashleg said:
Linkzmax said:

trashleg said:

right. see this post, why was ABC apparently going along with the "prof will check people out thing"

if that was me and id said something so vague and potentially dangerously ambiguous, id be shitting myself trying to clarify.

Are you always so overly cautious?

i clearly said "if that was me". meaning, if i was in ABC's shoes, being considered alien scum, i wouldnt be goig about being all ambiguous. i'd be instantly trying to fix it for clarification, since the ambiguity(sp?) of what i'd said could be suspicious, especially if i went along with it so long like ABC did. that was all. (for the record of anyone else who noticed my saying that, i didnt say "if anyone thinks i say anything suspicious, il poop my pants". if you think so, i would consider my comment to have been taken out of context).

Nobody was pressuring ABC at the time he made the ambiguous statement though. Obviously he wasn't a confirmed townie, but he wasn't considered alien scum any more than the next guy or gal.
Or do you mean once questioned about it you'd(if it were you in his shoes) have quickly tried to be very clear about it?

As for the rest of my points, thank you for responding to them. I don't totally buy your answers, but I'm not going to continue on about the same points either.



A Bad Clown said:
Hephaestos said:

with this however you secured your lynch tomorow, you both provided no reason, outloud said you were bandwagoning and are the 'tipping point' voter which proff will regal to explain to you how it makes you scum (but tomorow on your trail part 2, as today is useless).

Statement: As you could tell, I did not want to vote you too much.

The other's have showed that it looked you were being sneaky and trying to "buddy" up.

Query: If I were not to vote you, who would I vote instead? We have no other leads, and I there's not much else I can do.

It was to vote you, or have myself wrongfully lynched.


well you'll see my point later i guess.

otherwise, there's always the no lynch option. i myself vote wonk but i'm not asking you to do so since evidently you weren't convinced by previous arguments on him, so it'd be pretty much the same thing as what you-re doing now.



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO