i believe noname asked..

look at bolded :P

4) 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3916375

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3916428

and the one right after it, all non-nameless quote boxes directed at you.

3 in total.

I thought you just wanted some discussion. I'm going to assume that you were confused about which posts I was talking about. Despite that, even if they were directed at trash, or about trash, I must have been confused and you were not passively complaining about a lack of discussion when you get your window to post.

And, you had posted seconds before my first post, so I do not blame the window, but, being a nice guy, I will assume that you were playing video games for those 2-3 hours that you were shown as online.

5) My issue with Gniz was that I made an observation about something he did and voted him for it. His response was to tell me that my observation was somehow baseless and innacurate and that made it a good reason for his vote on me. Sure, his play style has a lot to do with it, avoiding questions, discrediting good analysis, those don't say townie to me, and interrogation is not simply about finding scum, but also finding townie. Gniz was completely unhelpful. So, I will concede that point, if you will concede mine.

6) And if you could prove that I was playing differently, you would be voting for a logical fallacy, because your reasoning is that I'm trying to replicate my past gameplay and failing at that, when such a simple solution would be that I've simply altered my gameplay due to new knowledge and experience. 

I was referring mainly to trash calling me drunk.

But I also have to mention that trash was very cooperative. I'll admit I was accidentally overbearing a bit too overbearing. I'm sorry for doing that, Trashleg.

thank you.

That is specifically why I was focused on ABC for so long and then after really looking back over his posts couldn't bring myself to vote him. Things like what you pointed out. He doesn't seem like mafia.

Let me know what you think of wonk and stefl. Stefl I've been ignoring since he hasn't been posting much, and he is one of the people I'm curently looking at.

Just checking in to say that I have been here in case anyone checked my online status. I've caught up on the thread and now I'm just going through it and working on posts.

Rather than spam the thread with a ton of posts I'm just going to have one for each person I'm quoting. I know the long posts can be harder to digest, but it was the easiest way to be sure I get all of my thoughts out without restating things or getting caught up with new posts by others.  Since some of them would be real pain to reply to, I will index each quote within my posts to make it easier to do that. For the sake of not creating a giant quote pyramid, unless someone is just going to requote one individual bit, I think it'd be best to quote any of my posts(so I know you want to question me or point something out) but snip everything out and only leave a hyperlink for the post in question. Note that I'm only suggesting this for the long posts.
An example using one of prof's posts:

1) Point
2) Question
3) etc...

At the time of this post I'm at the top of page 8 and I know there were things here I wanted to get to, but hopefully I'll be finished soon.

Had a lot to catch up with, but I have decided against voting for ABC. In fact I'll even go as far as removing the FoS. Among other things that I'll get to in a future posts, noname's advice of "[take] a step back and [stop] overthinking everything. [go] with what you apparently believe" has helped a lot. My take is ABC is an often-confusing, border-line useless townie.(If I were to ascribe to Wonk's idea of voting a "weak" player then I'd be the one tying the knot) But instead of just going with that I've been trying to see how Wonk's, who I have and still am suspicious of, actions would fit with a mafia-ABC. I do recognize the time-travel excuses as bizarre, but I see that as not only misremembering the order of events, but misremembering his own logic. Certainly not a good thing even if he's a townie, but that's why I'm going to go back to ignoring for the most part.

I know what you mean by having questions going unanswered too. I keep a list so that if I feel I've been ignored I can reiterate the question.

If this is just an act, then shame on you. If it's the truth and it turns out to be the case, then I really hope you don't follow through on that either.

I thought I was going to have more to say to you, but apparently not. Since this is fairly small, no indexing here.

1) I'm not talking about whether he wanted an opinion on prof or an opinion from prof at all. As part of his explanation for asking for prof, ABC links prof to trangent as people not posting. Then ABC explicitly states why he didn't mention trangent. As I just said in a post to prof, I do think ABC is misremembering his logic, but if you were legitimately concerned with his answer I have a very hard time believing you'd have simply accepted what he said.

@bolded I find it odd that it's been nearly 24 hours since this post and you've said quite a bit, but never directed anything at ABC.

2) Just for the sake of completeness, IF there is a doctor and making the assumption that there are only two or three mafia(safe to say I believe) and no SK,(not a certainty) then odds are better that the doctor makes a save after a no lynch than a random lynch on a weak player. I don't think it's helpful to go through the math, but I'd be happy to after the round is over. Of course this is only true if there is a doctor, and only he(or she) and the mods know if one even exists. I haven't crunched the numbers for other protective/redirection roles(if any exist) but with pure randomness I've found they're almost always better than the doctor anyway.

3) Is the "no" supposed to be "on?" Are the next two sentences your explanation for why you feel more uneasy about Heph than trasleg? Otherwise, why so?

4) Finally, I'd upgrade you to an HoS but Heph and trash are getting them and I only have two hands. But you said something(and I will not explain what) that had I been online at the time I'd have voted for you. Since then it doesn't seem as major as I had thought, but I'm going to be very disappointed if I was right about it.

noname already quoted this, but all of this implies there are exactly 3 mafia, which is fine if you're merely assuming that. However, I think it's hypocritical that you called Stefl out for doing the same.

I'd like to thank the three of you(including prof and Heph) for explaining it and giving me examples. That does make a lot of sense, but I still think prof is being far too extreme about ABC to be mafia if ABC flips townie. Although if he were to ever try to trump the fact that he was against the lynch, I would take that as a sign of already knowing the reality of it, thus scum; however, it's quite doubtful that would happen now with me saying it.

1) What "option" are you referring to?

2) prof has already explained himself here, but I thought it was apparent in his post what the conlusion was. "So, you said 192 new posts, eh? That means that last time you were online was 14:41 GMT 2/13/11, which means you went without posting for 20 hours, and just watched." prof never asked or demanded for an explanation, so I really don't see where you got that from. trashleg did try to offer one and it's perfectly reasonable for prof to respond to that.

3) HoS: Hephaestos
I certainly have an idea now, but ~100 posts ago I wasn't as satisfied with my decision at the time. I really don't like the way you(and trashleg) have voted for time limits when the attention of several people shifted in your(and her) direction. Since you pointed it out once again, you defended me in my first game to try and gain the trust of a townie. You've done the same for ABC, and I believe it to be for the same reason. I think despite your claim otherwise, you do want ABC lynched and you're trying to have a deadline instituted to rush people into finishing him off instead of taking the closer look at you.

If I were to vote now it'd be for your lynch. I'm going to go back and take that closer look though.