By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hephaestos on 14 February 2011
trashleg said:

not being funny or anything,

 

but 192 new posts overnight? thats going to take some time to read and i only have an hour before i have to leave for work. but il try read as much as i can, then il be back online at like 4.30am GMT. sorry.

yeah we have gotten quite a few verbose happy players... it does make the game harder to follow... but oh so much interesting to read.

 

(oh yeah I just replied for the lolz of linkz and proff saying we talk a lot :-p)



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Around the Network
Hephaestos on 14 February 2011
Linkzmax said:
Wonktonodi said:
A Bad Clown said:
Wonktonodi said:
snip


Why would you need the prof to see if heph was a problem?  Or were you trying to mean you wanted to wait for the prof to be posting more so you could have your thoughts on him.  If the second is what you meant no one got that from your wording.

The second, sort of. I wantedto see prof post along with heph but that time I just wanted to see all the players start conversing and prof and tangent were the only ones not. I would have mentioned Tangent but he said he was gone and would come back yesterday...where the hell is tanget anyways?

Ok that makes sence but I hope you see how your wording caused people confusing and by not clearing it up makes you look worse.  I still have the other questions.  I requoted the post just a few of my posts back.

I was hopeful that my brain would figure some things out in my sleep, albeit a short sleep, last night, but no luck. Since I may not be able to come on at all today I think it's best that I point this out now in case ABC is lynched. More timestamp fun:

A Bad Clown on 02/10/11 17:30 EST

 

Wonktonodi said:
A Bad Clown said:

I might have to vote against nonome after the day one accusation, unlesss heph is still playing. I'm confused who's voting for who so far, it shows Stef voting twice


bad clown take a look if someoen else explains is sooner or beter my apologies.

Current votes (6 needed to lynch):

[0, L-6] Linkzmax:  (theprof00), (Stefl1504)

[0, L-6] Stefl1504:  (noname2200)

[1, L-5] noname2200: theprof00

[1, L-5] theprof00: Stefl1504

[0, L-6] trashleg: (Hephaestos)

[1, L-5] A Bad Clown: noname2200

 

the number on the far left is the number of current votes.  when a persons name is in brakets that means he(or she) voted for that person but is no longer voting for that person.

Ok, I'll wait for the prof to check him out to see if he could be bad news

trangentspree on 02/10/11 18:17 EST

 

I'm here, got my PM.

I wouldn't really regard myself as late as the game started less than 12 hours ago, but for those wondering, I have been out of the house all day long, first at work and then at a friend's house for dinner.

I'm pretty knackered and heading to bed. I'll have most of the day to post tomorrow. One or two things have caught my eye already.

So it's another case of ABC later using things that happened in the future to try to explain actions in the past. I think it's just ABC making far too many assumptions and now using anything in the thread to try to validate those assumptions; however, in case he gets lynched and it turns out tomorrow I'm wrong, I just want to point out how Wonk cleared this as making sense. I believe Wonk's too good to not check out a story to see if it really makes sense, so this gives me the impression that this line of questioning was truly artificial.(I'm undecided on the interaction with radish)

I swear there was more, but my mind is a fog and I'm running late for work. If I have a chance I'll try to remember and post it.


well since you're putting brainpower into this.

1) I read the initial comment as proff... that he was waiting for proff's opinion.

2) "sort of" means the answer is pretty much BS, that he's fed up with explaining it cause it was a slip that he prefered not to have made.

3) I now get your future remarks. makes the answers even more BS.

Still I don't get that high a scum vibe from him.... the only think that really bothers me is I would have expected him to drop the ball when proff was after him and be already fed up with playing here, he was already hesitant to join, was very enoyed with having to talk about his other site... He's making a big big effort to stay in the game and be active. (and i might regret that paragraph just there...)



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Hephaestos on 14 February 2011
theprof00 said:
Stefl1504 said:
theprof00 said:

Unfortunately, I have to say that this post imo guarantees ABCs town affiliation. That idea that noname's effort paints him as pro-town is townie logic.

I also think that noname is town. While I don't think he would go through all that trouble to chronicle the statements over time, I think he is capable of doing so in order to appear townie. In either case, both appear much more town to me than previously.

However, this also furthers my suspicion of trashleg for putting an easy vote on ABC.

While ABC is horrendously bad at communication (and thinks he's doing much better as a robot, despite being a great example of self-fulfilling prophecy), I think he has very good intuition, and has been making some good points.

@bolded: sorry if you already gave some explanation, but could you please specify your suspicion(because you said it furthers your suspicion)? I understand why you are saying that trashlegs vote make her suspicious, but I still see ABC as a scum canidate...

Talking of voted, I thought I already unvoted... but my vote is still counted... so once again:

Unvote

it has to do with her calm collectedness, as well as her vote on ABC.

At another point, though I hate to refer to it, she said she was in bad shape IRL. Heph unvoted her. Her next words were something like, "hey get back here and throw accusations around", yet heph's vote was a joke/random vote in the first place and he never really accused her that much of anything.

IMO, there's something wrong with that situation. She hasn't posted enough for this to be warranted as evidence, but I think that roughly saying, "put your vote back on me" is quite suspicious in itself.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3910064

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3910085

fun and games refer directly to noname's post so i'm not sure your linking this to my unvote is really accurate...



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Hephaestos on 14 February 2011

great so i'm doomed to read when I get back as i'm really in a shifted time slot from y'all



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

theprof00 on 14 February 2011
trashleg said:

not being funny or anything,

 

but 192 new posts overnight? thats going to take some time to read and i only have an hour before i have to leave for work. but il try read as much as i can, then il be back online at like 4.30am GMT. sorry.

you are being funny, because it's barely been 160 in 24 hours.



Around the Network
theprof00 on 14 February 2011
Hephaestos said:
theprof00 said:

-snip-

it has to do with her calm collectedness, as well as her vote on ABC.

At another point, though I hate to refer to it, she said she was in bad shape IRL. Heph unvoted her. Her next words were something like, "hey get back here and throw accusations around", yet heph's vote was a joke/random vote in the first place and he never really accused her that much of anything.

IMO, there's something wrong with that situation. She hasn't posted enough for this to be warranted as evidence, but I think that roughly saying, "put your vote back on me" is quite suspicious in itself.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3910064

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3910085

fun and games refer directly to noname's post so i'm not sure your linking this to my unvote is really accurate...


that wasn't it at all.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3910063

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3910085

those are the two posts.

It's also suspicious that I'm already frustrated with you. How could you possibly miss that?

 

Edit: snipped quote boxes



theprof00 on 14 February 2011
trashleg said:

not being funny or anything,

 

but 192 new posts overnight? thats going to take some time to read and i only have an hour before i have to leave for work. but il try read as much as i can, then il be back online at like 4.30am GMT. sorry.

as of this quoted post, there were 59 posts on the page @100 pp @18:59 GMT 2/14/11

first post on page 5 http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3914696 @19:14 GMT 2/13/11

post difference: 159 posts

bottom of page 4 http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3914670 @19:00 GMT 2/13/11

total post difference: 170

bottom-mid page 4 http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3914377 @15:02 GMT 2/13/11

total post difference: 192

total time difference 28 hours @ 192 posts.

 

your post on page 4

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3913155 18:43 GMT 2/12/11. 

So, you said 192 new posts, eh? That means that last time you were online was 14:41 GMT 2/13/11, which means you went without posting for 20 hours, and just watched.

 



theprof00 on 14 February 2011

Also, HoS trashleg



theprof00 on 14 February 2011
Hephaestos said:

yeah we have gotten quite a few verbose happy players... it does make the game harder to follow... but oh so much interesting to read.

 

(oh yeah I just replied for the lolz of linkz and proff saying we talk a lot :-p)

You're sarcasm isn't helping your situation, Heph.



theprof00 on 14 February 2011
Hephaestos said:
theRepublic said:
A Bad Clown said:

Prof, this has been bugging me since the start of this. Out of all the people in the game, you chose me to constantly quote and argue with. When radish was suspicious you went to me instead and casually passed it off from radish. I’m thinking that you and wonk and planning this, to kill two birds with one stone by having each of you accuse a separate weaker person. Wonk stopped quickly with a “:D” and changed to me while you seemed to be slowing down on my interrogation. I think you two are swapping targets, to keep it looking like you two are concerned town people!

It is not possible for them to plan a coordinated attack on Day One unless they are cheating.  The mafia, aliens in this case, don't get to talk to each other until Night One.

o recall both massons and mafia being told they could talk day one last round... trucks was a masson, he might have liked the idea. Especially as this little advantage could help tweak the game to a 2 mafia other day SK rather than just 3 mafia?

Well I did think it was wierd when I read it in the quicktopics but now I wouldn't rule it out...

noname:

"I can neither confirm nor deny that GodOfWar got a...oh wait, I already modkilled him. So, er... stop posting during the day 'n stuff!"