Linkzmax said:
Requoting you: "I it doesn't necessarily mean there would be another no lynch but it makes it much more likely. So although odds are that player X is a townie. If a no lynch leads to the scum getting an extra kill. Odds are it won't be player X and it 100% chance that the player is a townie.
If weakest player had a neutral or slightly positive effect on the town. Meaning the participate, aren't a distraction. use sound reasoning, are clear in there posts. know what's going on and make informed decisions. Then yes the town wouldn't be better off without them. However if the weakest player has a negative effect on the town. I'm all for taking the weakest player out. However it seems the player that stands out is often the weakest player." You never said "townie X" only "player X", and yes there is quite a distinction. Also the bolded, do you mean "killed night one"? Otherwise wasn't your whole idea for the weakest player to be the one that is lynched day one? You're giving me a strong reason to believe my theory that you knew radish wouldn't be lynched. |
You are right. I'm making to many smile mistakes I need to slow down and reread before posting.