Now that doesn't seem suspicious at all...

Stop asking me questions when I'm sleeping! And I wanted to wait for the prof so I could look at everyone in the game before asking questions but I was rudely interrupted by multi questions on where I played this before >.>

If you explain how it's suspicious, I'll try and solve the situation - but that response makes me feel more confident that I've hit a Mafia.

I post when I'm online.  You can answer the questions when you come online.  Prof had already posted though. And other people had posted less than him.  So why not just say everyone instead of prof by name.  That lead to questions although I agree mostly irellavent about where else you have played because of your confusion about basic game mechanics yet familiarity with less basic things.

Prof, this has been bugging me since the start of this. Out of all the people in the game, you chose me to constantly quote and argue with. When radish was suspicious you went to me instead and casually passed it off from radish. I’m thinking that you and wonk and planning this, to kill two birds with one stone by having each of you accuse a separate weaker person. Wonk stopped quickly with a “:D” and changed to me while you seemed to be slowing down on my interrogation. I think you two are swapping targets, to keep it looking like you two are concerned town people!

radish for me wasn't every a primary target.  The smile was because I was glad to see him make a good post.  You however have made some odd posts.  Now while I'm currently not going beyond a finger of suspicion on you.  That could change depending on how well you can answer simple questions.  I had another question I asked you about your suspicions on heph that you haven't answerd yet.

"Radish has been a weaker player in the two games I've been in.  I've had no interaction with ABC.  I'm all for people making the case though.  Even trangent with only one post so far could have a case made as well" 

That?

Isn't that confirming what I was just saying? You could choose to lynch ABC or trangent as "weaker players", but you chose me as an alternative due to misguided opinions on what occured at the end of last round.

Well, when we decided to look at someone else you finally started talking to me. Earlier in the thread when I was being ganked you didn't have much to say about me. When prof and I decided to look into you specifically you at first didn't have much to say but quickly posted again about not really being suspcious of you. It looked like you wanted to keep low until you saw that others still had votes on me. This would have been the perfect time to vote me because the conversation against you restarted. Voting now would be tactical at this point when two people would both be questioning you. If the prof would have questioned you first, you would have to wait until you could appeal to him by voting the person he was suspicious of. Now that you've stated you want to vote me he will probably follow along, saving yourself.

It wasn't just the end of last round radish it was from the point you were confirmed a mason. Where you posted little and didn't do much to find scum plus hammering while people were still discussing. So my reason is much more than end game and it's not a misguided opinion. Also your post this round about hoping the thread doesn't explode because you had a hard time keeping up.  That with me really not wanting to have lynching someone new be an alternative for the first day.  However now I would like to see if we can find something better than an alternative.

Now I hope that makes it more clear to you. 

I said that when prof checked in, and I was already talking to noname and you before he started talking again.