ugh you are giving me a headache.

@bolded

so what you are saying is that you wanted to check ME out?

"Ok, I'll wait for the prof to check him out to see if he could be bad news"

that makes sense. You poorly worded your post, which falls under the "c)"category of not trying enough.

However, you then respond to my question of "why are you waiting for ME to check him out. What in my history paints me as the 'guy that interrogates people'" by saying:

"I remember lots of finger pointing from what I read, I need to see everyone start posting to find out who might be mafia. I still think it's Trashleg..."

...

This whole (what I now think is a) misunderstanding, is what led to questions about your other mafia history and experience IIRC.
You call it rude questions, but it all stems from your inability to communicate properly. And it's not just me that misunderstood you, several people read the same thing.

PROTIP:

Word things in such a way that there can be no possible misinterpretation. Don't use pronouns like HE, HIM, IT unless we can be absolutely positive of what/who you are referring to. 

Sudden....urge...to...vote prof for not stopping....

congrats, you are the new radishead

This isn't Phoenix Wright...

Not stopping what?  Posting while you're sleeping?  Is he supposed to be psychic?  Did you really sleep in between your previous post and this one? 

Do you have anything you want to get off your chest before you get lynched today?  Becasue I think you might want to consider saying it. 

Disregarding all of these people, I'd like to question wonk. He stated he had no interaction with me then the next post he asked about "checking out the prof".  He looked like he was after radishead then suddenly stopped an switched to me. Maybe him and radish were play arguing?

Prof, this has been bugging me since the start of this. Out of all the people in the game, you chose me to constantly quote and argue with. When radish was suspicious you went to me instead and casually passed it off from radish. I’m thinking that you and wonk and planning this, to kill two birds with one stone by having each of you accuse a separate weaker person. Wonk stopped quickly with a “:D” and changed to me while you seemed to be slowing down on my interrogation. I think you two are swapping targets, to keep it looking like you two are concerned town people!

I'm interested to know who you play with because I can't imagine that you have a good record.

That's off topic, the fact of the matter is after "Pro tip" you seemed to lay off me. Also, it seems you still have your vote on noname. Noname has not given us any reason to be suspicious, and you can easily unvote him. I believe that you're planning to swap it too me after another player (wonk) will do it. Noname has already voted me so for you to be coming straight after him would have increased suspicions. Now the question is, why have you and wonk not voted me when around the same timeframe you both concluded that I should be lynched? Heph and trash;eg both voted me almost instantly so is there some lingering doubt you have?

First of all, that post including the "pro-tip" was completely ignored by you. You never responded with so much as half an effort. I ventured a guess that you mis-spoke, and you neither confirmed nor denied. 

I'm laying off you because IMO you are much more innocent than you absent-mindedly made yourself out to be. I don't think you have any inkling how to play. 

I never said that you SHOULD be lynched. I said you WILL be lynched, because IMO, you are a huge distraction. You don't answer questions properly, and it seems you don't care about accuracy too much either. I don't think you SHOULD be lynched because of that, though. For me, I can play fine without you becoming too much of a distraction, same for radishhead two or three games ago when he was playing really scummy but was town. He was distracting everyone, and I think even became a liability at endgame. Other players do not like liabilities.

Now the only reason I haven't unvoted is because it doesn't really matter. noname isn't going to get lynched barring any unforeseen slip. So, having my vote on him right now is basically akin to having no vote.