By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Hmmm, I just had a scary thought. If Stefl is the cop, then obviously there won't be any additional investigations. But actually it'd still be for the best, because another night kill would be additional hint, and it still improves odds at finding the aliens.



Around the Network
Linkzmax said:

Hmmm, I just had a scary thought. If Stefl is the cop, then obviously there won't be any additional investigations. But actually it'd still be for the best, because another night kill would be additional hint, and it still improves odds at finding the aliens.

yeah but its not like he's contributed anything anyway, so the results of his investigations are pointless?



Highwaystar101 said: trashleg said that if I didn't pay back the money she leant me, she would come round and break my legs... That's why people call her trashleg, because she trashes the legs of the people she loan sharks money to.
noname2200 said:
Hephaestos said:

 

1) yes i did recognize this in my answer (it's not the first game we have trouble communicating... Basically i feel i did say that in my answer), this is also why i removed the vote. The presure was not to have you answer but to force a reaction ( i literally used "react"), that didn't happen, which means the attempt doesn't have a result to conclude (what i was looking for was overreaction, dismissal...).

 

2) the logic is that the way you did it opened a thousand possible excuses for them to use on their vote " but i trust noname is a townie" , " but the others voted too so i moved with the town", " day was indeed draging and he was scummy" all of these insufficient in other circumstances.

I never said you forced anyone, more that you gave them a guilt free pass. They are still the ones ultimately responsible for voting.

 

3) i'm not wondering why you suspect abc, i'm just askining how come your discution concluded in abc being depicted as a town role by prof with you not arguing it, thus indirectly agreeing, and then still find him as your top suspect at the end of the day. Again i'm not talking of power role... Though it seems as though your fixated on that aspect.

The last point seems to have the only part that still requires a response (let me know if you feel otherwise).  I can see why you'd think that, but no, silence from me does not automatically equate to agreement.  In this particular case, I foresaw a pointless argument coming up, so I chose to avoid it.  ABC was the person I wanted to hear from, not prof, and debating with the latter was unlikely to get me much, especially after linkz weighed in on prof's side. 

Now that I've dispense with your questions, can you please answer the one I asked and that you haven't addressed yet?  For easy reference, it's how you can claim that I've primarily been making "late summaries and conclusions of the events."  On a related note, how much energy are you giving us this game?

Additional question created by your latest post, point 1, supra: you say there wasn't a "result to conclude."  What does that mean?  What were you expecting from me?  What would you have deemed an "overreaction," or a "dismissal"?

first yes i'm satisfied with the other discution points.

on the last question, sorry for not answering, I noticed that after posting.... but the page took so long to load that I fell asleep (Iphone in a house lost in countryside woods = bad reception for internet).

So for your "late summaries and conclusions of the events" (ecluding the 2 events pointed out in earlier posts). As i have been myself lagging a little, It seemed to me that after the joking and the initial interogation of ABC, for most of day one when you posted, you were posting and commenting after the facts, and drawing conclusions that had already been made. Now I do not look at timestamps most of the time when i catch up a thread, so your conclusions might have been close to the ones I read, the feeling was still that they were after. I guess anyone reading me might have the same impression, I have been reading this thread 200 posts at a time, so in consequence, the conclusions and answers have been comming in in bulk and sometimes repeat what was said previously (example, I just read FF and prof's discution on the scalpel and I notice that my points in the reply were part of FF's arguments to prof... i'd consider that as already been said if I were reading it). It's in no case in a pejorative way that I said that, but it's the feeling I had when I read your posts (and to be honnest the posts of a lot of people on day 1). I have to say though that not many posts give me this feeling on day 2 (yours or others), and this might be due to a more balanced rythm.

On how much ennergy. Well, I do read everything, but I have had 2 events that changed my play from other games. More work at work (boss says we have currently less work... that's because he's sending everything my way, even the big clients...) and more falling asleep while reading (since the begining of 2011, i've been falling asleep much faster than before... even took a few days off to rest.) So the question on energy is quite funny to me as it is pertinent, and the answer is truly "less". One major factor is that I have not been able to go back and reread this round, something I was able to do in all previous rounds.

Lastly, I wasn't expecting much, it's more that as I had a feeling of you beeing a bit set back from the center stage, any reaction from you would have given information. You stayed calm however, so my no conclusion means that I still lack information, nothing more.



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

noname2200 said:
noname2200 said:

Now that I've dispense with your questions, can you please answer the one I asked and that you haven't addressed yet?  For easy reference, it's how you can claim that I've primarily been making "late summaries and conclusions of the events."  On a related note, how much energy are you giving us this game?

Additional question created by your latest post, point 1, supra: you say there wasn't a "result to conclude."  What does that mean?  What were you expecting from me?  What would you have deemed an "overreaction," or a "dismissal"?


Follow-up:  why would talking to me today be "more informative than talking to proff"?

cause proff talks a hell lot and has therefore a lot more room to dilude the information we could get from him.



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

The results could never be pointless. It's doubtful he scanned someone guilty or he'd have likely voted today. But if he scanned someone(besides Republic) who scanned innocent, then a confirmed townie would be a positive. Actually considering they would most likely be killed at night, if that investigation would've been revealed then there's a case to simply lynch today instead of waiting until day three. It's moot though, because I believe it's doubtful that Stefl would allow himself to be modkilled if he was the cop, nor do I think his investigation would be shared if that happened to be the case.



Around the Network
theprof00 said:

And I only saw it because I had wonk's post to go by.

which means you're in the didn't notice did'nt know section... as you already had the morning result.



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

For most of the day Stefl had kept quiet. I for one blamed the shock of having two of our comrades die right before his eyes. From time to time, one of us went by him and asked "Are you okay Stefl?" but he didn't utter a word.

As the day went on people began losing their temper and the caring, worried questions were replaced by some probing with sticks but Stefl still wouldn't talk to any of us.

Since the stick probing seemed to lift everybody's spirit, I decided to try it out too. Unfortunately, the "stick" I picked up was actually a red hot fire poker which I rammed straight through Stefl's chest. On the plus side, when I pulled it out, there was a grilled Alien on the end of it.



Signature goes here!

Well now, that's good news.(And haha, I was right about that "random" vote) At least we're not in mislynch and lose(mylo) and won't be in lylo tomorrow. I definitely want to do a recap of Stefl and reread the posts of day two. I also have some information to share, but I'm sure I'll be questioned thoroughly. So all of that will have to wait until after this meeting I have to attend.



well i'm ready to vote no lynch as soon as proff gives us his conclusions of the big question of today!

Did you notice the clue?



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

ok. since we got one, does this mean its a good thing or a bad thing to go ahead and lynch ABC too?



Highwaystar101 said: trashleg said that if I didn't pay back the money she leant me, she would come round and break my legs... That's why people call her trashleg, because she trashes the legs of the people she loan sharks money to.