I wish they would have treated crysis 2 like the did crysis 1 and kept it off the consoles. I was really looking foward to blow you away kind of graphics for people with high end machines. But instead we are getting a game that can't be to advanced as it has to work with 6 year old technology.

PC gaming is in a sad state right now. I haven't had to upgrade a video card in 3 years. If looking at crysis 2 system requirements is any indication it will be a few more years until i have to.

Is that such a bad thing? :P

umm... seems people fail to forget to compare texture work.. which Crysis 2 totally destroys Killzone 3 with. Much higher quality textures.

Well, I'll have to disagree with you there.  Look roughly the same quality to me.  Though, I will admit, I do like Crysis 2's color scheme better.

look at the wall textures.

Yes, they are sharper than KZ3's but if people cared about textures nobody would play COD.

I honestly could'nt care less about those wall textures. Common i won't stick my nose in the wall that often. Overall after playing both demo I say Killzone 3 look and play better. Even with move it's pretty fun. I would admit that the color scheme is better in Crysis 2 demo like this thismeintiel mentioned.

I just realize something..Are you comparing Crysis 2 (PC) Demo with Killzone 3 (PS3) demo. Because if you want to compare textures at least compare apples with apples. Like the xbox360 demo with killzone 3 demo. You can correct me if I'm wrong and i'm just making this up.

They may be slighter sharper, but like I said, roughly the same quality.  You definitely can't tell the difference while in motion.

@ wiilicious

Yea, this was a 360 demo compared to a PS3 beta.  Of course, we don't know if the demo for Killzone will be based on this beta or if they will be using a newer build.  Either way, things are only going to get better for Killzone 3.

Anybody else notice the glitch at ~ 2:50 on Killzone 3?

you mean the stretching body? lol, ya so that shows no game is perfect.