Well, there's 42 reviews for it recorded on Metacritic under PS3. PS3 metapage has exactly the same score as 360 meta page 360 has 46 reviews.
58 is a mediocre meta score, not an attrocious one. Clearly the game isn't without it's redeeming qualities and there are obviously some people (including 2 reviewers for PS3 and 4 for 360) who think it's a A/B game. Basically it's in the same meta league as Jim Cameron's Avatar game. I don't plan on playing either. Another game that is in the same meta league is LOTR: Aragorn's Quest. I did give that game a go and I thought it was lame, I've really liked some games in the high 50's - low 60's range though, like Heroes of Might and Magic: Quest for the Dragon Bone staff (PS2 gen) and Robin Hood: Defender of the Crown (also PS2 gen), so clearly the 55-65 meta range is very hit and miss territory. As is reflected in the meta score.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix
