If I had to guess... i'd say that the promise of globalization Clinton pushed was that our old outdated jobs would be replaced with higher paying better jobs that never matieralized, because it saves just as much money if not more to outsource those jobs to poorer nations with decent enducational bases.
That and well, high tech manufacturing jobs take a lot more to do then regular manufaturing jobs anyway.
Aside from that, as the article says. Making 10 year job forcasts is just dumb anyway.
I don't know if you can say it's beyond partisian though... afterall the big worry is that the US ends up with Europeon like labor. Making the US more worthy of investment rather then our trend to make it LESS profitbale is the way to go. Which you know, is what one side of teh aisle has been argueing forever.