By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Call of Duty 5 back to ww2 :(

iberz on 17 December 2007
Zucas said:
Faxanadu said:
iberz said:

To be quite honest im an arab and even though I thought COD 4 was brilliant I couldn't help but feel slightly bad about killing arabs throughout the game.

I think an excellent innovation for COD 5 would be the ability to take different sides like in Command and Conquer.


So its cool to continue killing the Germans, right?


 Your not killing anyone.  Its a virtual simulation haha.  Starting to sound like Jack Thompson guys. 

Its not real, so your not even killing anyone.  Just a game. 


Yeah but the game feels so real. I mean the stuff the arab soldiers come out with is exactly what I here when I go to my homeland. Every aspect of it is just so real.

 On that topic apart from being shot and regenerating somehow after two seconds there was amazingly nothing else unrealistic in this game which is quite amazing considering Goldeneye AKA Fps genesis is only 10 years old.



Currently Playing: Gears 2, World at War, GTA IV, Banjo Nuts and Bolts

The Greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge - Stephen Hawking

 

Around the Network
Cryoakira on 17 December 2007

Guys, there something everybody that like CoD should know by now :

REAL (=best) Call of Duty Games are made by the creators of the serie : Infinity Ward.

Other games are made by other studios and the result either sucks (like Big Red one), either remain a pale copy of the IW work (CoD3).

CoD5 = Treyarch = Warning.



superchunk on 17 December 2007

my favorite war shooter has always been Battlefield 2. You could play as any of the warriors as well.



takeru51 on 17 December 2007
Borkachev said:
Bill O'Reilly's Call of Duty: Developer Treyarch and historian Bill O'Reilly proudly present a historically accurate World War II shooter from the first-person perspective putting you in the shoes of a Nazi soldier as you experience the atrocities such as the Malmedy massacre, in which many German prisoners of war were mercilessly killed, committed by the American soldiers with your own eyes.

That's some pretty dumb satire. She ought to realize that, evil or not, right-wing Americans are pretty much the last people on Earth who would make a game like that.

The reason why this is funny is because Bill O'Reilly said that during the Malmedy Massacre, Americans massacred Germans, when in reality it was the other way around. Normally I wouldn't think it to be a big deal, but O'Reilly was very, very certain that he was correct on this, and he even deleted the transcripts from his show once he was proved wrong. You can probably find it on youtube.



El Duderino on 17 December 2007
famousringo said:
Onimusha12 said:
I guess a Civil War game would be too much to ask?

I loved North and South.


Same here, great game...

I´d love a WW1 game, problem is you´d have to call it the great war and noone would know which one that is (it wasn´t called WW1 fron the start).

Another great one would be a fictional cold war gone hot game, USA and Europe vs. Russia and China WTF!!!!



 

 

 

Around the Network
patriot7mejr on 17 December 2007

THe call of duty games suck all it does is follow the same thing as other shooting games just shoot and kill



Canyarion on 17 December 2007

Nazis are the easiest baddies because they're supposedly pure evil. Nazis and terrorists. Apparently nobody feels bad about killing them. Something tells me that developers are afraid of trying anything different than that. 

 Although the better argument is probably that the USA lost the Vietnamese war. 



hongkongfuey^2 on 17 December 2007

Simply put. I wouldn't buy it if its WWII. I bought #4 first day when i heard its gonna be modern warfare.