noname2200 said:
Hephaestos said:
There are about 7 townies analysing the situation this round...
|
Interesting turn of phrase here. How would you know that the most active players are townies?
Hephaestos said:
Now we have suspicon flying on about 7-8 players and barely any evidence. Do you really think these 8 players will be held accountable on the debates of the first day later on? no half of these debates will be forgoten by most of the town. That is what I call waisting amo.
|
What makes you so certain of that, exactly? We've seen that this is not true: recall the Mortal Kombat game, for instance, where sabby was lynched partly because of a comment Khuutra made several days, if not weeks, prior.
|
1) How would you know they are not? The asumption can be that everyone is town or everyone is mafia. I prefer to believe in people's inocence before I have decent reason to doubt them. Heck last game I put my neck out for linkz because the evidence on him was flawed, in the GoW game I declared myself to save Nickels from a lynch, that's just how I play, until something ticks I like to believe people, and so far the only big ticks I got were Radish's attitude thowards his lie and GoW's unnecessary agressivity. Also the people doing relevant analysing are not necessarely the most active that would be a gross misinterpretation.
2) Do you notice that you're making my point there? sabby being linched because of something said on day one, that was not yet waisted in dead end arguments against him... So yes take notes, quote it, but don't start a lynch train on every detail, this brings confusion and weakens the town for later.