By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dtewi said:
theprof00 said:

Did you even read my Potals post?

I spell it out both in simple maths and in behavior.

Heph has been almost absent. He is extremely distant this game. LIsten! He's talked more with hatmoza and j0 than  to OTHER PLAYERS.

As far as specific suspicions about you or ToS. I hardly see how you can think that. I have barely nothing on either of you. But it's nice to know that you THINK I do :)

And yes, the yomi translates exactly:

Yomi 1: I'm going to defend a mafia friend.
Yomi 1 counter: I know that you're defending your mafia friend.
Yomi 2: I'm aware of your suspicion of me being mafia, so I won't defend my mafia friend.
Yomi 2 counter: I know that you're aware of my suspicions, so I know you'll not defend another mafia.
Yomi 3: I know that you realize that I am aware of your suspicions, so instead of not defending my mafia friend, I will defend him because you expect me not to defend him.
Yomi 3 counter-
a) *this is you* I know that you think I am going to suspect you for not defending a mafia because you know that I know that you are aware of my suspicions and so, you would do the opposite, and defend him, thinking that I am expecting you to not defend him.
b) I know that you're mafia defending your friend. (recursion of yomi 1 counter)

=*.*=

It would be extremely nice if this game were only Yomi 1.

I knew you would think that



Around the Network
theprof00 said:
theprof00 said:
nordlead said:

I'm voting for Radish because he didn't want to lynch day 1. He said he never lynched day 1, then decided to backtrack because others found out otherwise. You say it is baseless, I say it is saying what I am saying just in slightly different words. I took his post where he originally voted as an nod toward the same reasoning I had. Maybe I interpret it differently than you, but that is how I saw it. No, he didn't explicitly say why he was voting becuse radish lied, but as I said I don't think it is as bad as a poor reason for a vote.

As for avoiding prof, I agree avoiding a question is bad (granted with over 340 posts in a single day I can see it happening). However, he denied avoiding questions and I may have missed the second time they were asked in the screwed up thread.

i'm sorry I wasn't referring to you. I was referring to kantors vote. Take my post, and insert Kantor where "his" is in the first line.

wait

You knew it was about Kantor after all? (bolded)

Why did you bring yourself up at all?

You are sounding some serious alarms nord.


And this is why I suspect nord, FF. Not mainly because he answered a question that wasn't even addressed to him and answered it as if it was, but because I posted this seconds after he posted his, and I haven't heard one thing in response.

 

Edit: and he hasn't been back since.

...is a possible miscommunication probable cause for suspicion prof?



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

Stefl1504 said:
theprof00 said:
Stefl1504 said:

After reading through Kantors posts again I pretty much think he is also an alternative to homer, at least I would like that we put some real presure on him before the day ends. It should not hurt to get him at L-3 or 2 to get some additional Info, but I still think homer should be our lynching target if we want to lynch.


why should homer be our lynching target over kantor who did the exact same thing as homer?

They both used faulty reasoning to vote for someone, but homer's not as experienced as kantor. 

Why have you not voted for someone, neither are in danger of being lynched yet, and you have a preference but haven't used your actions to back up your words?

I don't really get why you are demanding that I have to vote... but fine I give in for now... and since I want to get pressure on kantor I will vote for him for now... Later today I want to change my vote to Homer... because... he just feels more scummy to me -.-

Vote: Kantor

but please note that I would really have prefered not voting for anyone right now...

So you openly acknowledge that your vote is a hollow empty threat done because a big bad man told you to?

Not only that, but I never asked you to vote for Kantor.

FoS stefl.



Fuck this.

I have school in 20 minutes, and after school...well, its monday over here...and I've told you guys before, Monday is very busy for me.

I'll be back in 14 hours, so I'mma gonna go with 

Vote - Kantor

I really hope you guys are right about this....Still got my eyes on you Final-fan !



dtewi said:
theprof00 said:
theprof00 said:
nordlead said:

I'm voting for Radish because he didn't want to lynch day 1. He said he never lynched day 1, then decided to backtrack because others found out otherwise. You say it is baseless, I say it is saying what I am saying just in slightly different words. I took his post where he originally voted as an nod toward the same reasoning I had. Maybe I interpret it differently than you, but that is how I saw it. No, he didn't explicitly say why he was voting becuse radish lied, but as I said I don't think it is as bad as a poor reason for a vote.

As for avoiding prof, I agree avoiding a question is bad (granted with over 340 posts in a single day I can see it happening). However, he denied avoiding questions and I may have missed the second time they were asked in the screwed up thread.

i'm sorry I wasn't referring to you. I was referring to kantors vote. Take my post, and insert Kantor where "his" is in the first line.

wait

You knew it was about Kantor after all? (bolded)

Why did you bring yourself up at all?

You are sounding some serious alarms nord.


And this is why I suspect nord, FF. Not mainly because he answered a question that wasn't even addressed to him and answered it as if it was, but because I posted this seconds after he posted his, and I haven't heard one thing in response.


Edit: and he hasn't been back since.

...is a possible miscommunication probable cause for suspicion prof?

bolded for English

I pressured him and he disappeared.



Around the Network
theprof00 said:
Stefl1504 said:
theprof00 said:
Stefl1504 said:

After reading through Kantors posts again I pretty much think he is also an alternative to homer, at least I would like that we put some real presure on him before the day ends. It should not hurt to get him at L-3 or 2 to get some additional Info, but I still think homer should be our lynching target if we want to lynch.


why should homer be our lynching target over kantor who did the exact same thing as homer?

They both used faulty reasoning to vote for someone, but homer's not as experienced as kantor. 

Why have you not voted for someone, neither are in danger of being lynched yet, and you have a preference but haven't used your actions to back up your words?

I don't really get why you are demanding that I have to vote... but fine I give in for now... and since I want to get pressure on kantor I will vote for him for now... Later today I want to change my vote to Homer... because... he just feels more scummy to me -.-

Vote: Kantor

but please note that I would really have prefered not voting for anyone right now...

So you openly acknowledge that your vote is a hollow empty threat done because a big bad man told you to?

Not only that, but I never asked you to vote for Kantor.

FoS stefl.

I did vote for kantor because I decided so, I just did not decide to vote until you presured me into doing so, it's a empty thread because I did not decide to vote right now... also I am pretty fine with that FoS...



Stefl1504 said:
theprof00 said:
Stefl1504 said:
theprof00 said:
Stefl1504 said:

After reading through Kantors posts again I pretty much think he is also an alternative to homer, at least I would like that we put some real presure on him before the day ends. It should not hurt to get him at L-3 or 2 to get some additional Info, but I still think homer should be our lynching target if we want to lynch.


why should homer be our lynching target over kantor who did the exact same thing as homer?

They both used faulty reasoning to vote for someone, but homer's not as experienced as kantor. 

Why have you not voted for someone, neither are in danger of being lynched yet, and you have a preference but haven't used your actions to back up your words?

I don't really get why you are demanding that I have to vote... but fine I give in for now... and since I want to get pressure on kantor I will vote for him for now... Later today I want to change my vote to Homer... because... he just feels more scummy to me -.-

Vote: Kantor

but please note that I would really have prefered not voting for anyone right now...

So you openly acknowledge that your vote is a hollow empty threat done because a big bad man told you to?

Not only that, but I never asked you to vote for Kantor.

FoS stefl.

I did vote for kantor because I decided so, I just did not decide to vote until you presured me into doing so, it's a empty thread because I did not decide to vote right now... also I am pretty fine with that FoS...


Man... that was stupid formulated I hope it does not cause any misunderstandings... -.-



theprof00 said:
Hephaestos said:

Heck besides the 5-6 players shifting their votes arround every 5 minutes, I'd say most of the town is being cautious. 

This is quite the exaggeration, Heph. Care to explain why you're making him out to be somewhat more reckless than anyone else?

? how is that an exageration?

you don't think that his 2 revenge votes are more reckless than anyone else in the town? they were both pretty baseless hence why they are deemed "revenge" by many.

I really don't get your point here prof, you managed to read the middle statement of my paragraph but not the rest?



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Stefl1504 said:
Stefl1504 said:
theprof00 said:
Stefl1504 said:
theprof00 said:
Stefl1504 said:

After reading through Kantors posts again I pretty much think he is also an alternative to homer, at least I would like that we put some real presure on him before the day ends. It should not hurt to get him at L-3 or 2 to get some additional Info, but I still think homer should be our lynching target if we want to lynch.


why should homer be our lynching target over kantor who did the exact same thing as homer?

They both used faulty reasoning to vote for someone, but homer's not as experienced as kantor. 

Why have you not voted for someone, neither are in danger of being lynched yet, and you have a preference but haven't used your actions to back up your words?

I don't really get why you are demanding that I have to vote... but fine I give in for now... and since I want to get pressure on kantor I will vote for him for now... Later today I want to change my vote to Homer... because... he just feels more scummy to me -.-

Vote: Kantor

but please note that I would really have prefered not voting for anyone right now...

So you openly acknowledge that your vote is a hollow empty threat done because a big bad man told you to?

Not only that, but I never asked you to vote for Kantor.

FoS stefl.

I did vote for kantor because I decided so, I just did not decide to vote until you presured me into doing so, it's a empty thread because I did not decide to vote right now... also I am pretty fine with that FoS...


Man... that was stupid formulated I hope it does not cause any misunderstandings... -.-

rushing through your responses stefl? 

You just basically said that you were voting simply to put pressure and that you would remove your vote before a lynch was made. That, to kantor, is a hollow vote, he will feel no pressure from your action.

You also never answered my question about why homer and not kantor though they both voted for poor reasons. 



Hephaestos said:
theprof00 said:
Hephaestos said:

Heck besides the 5-6 players shifting their votes arround every 5 minutes, I'd say most of the town is being cautious. 

This is quite the exaggeration, Heph. Care to explain why you're making him out to be somewhat more reckless than anyone else?

? how is that an exageration?

you don't think that his 2 revenge votes are more reckless than anyone else in the town? they were both pretty baseless hence why they are deemed "revenge" by many.

I really don't get your point here prof, you managed to read the middle statement of my paragraph but not the rest?

How is that an exaggeration? Well let me clarify it for you. "5-6 players shifting their votes arround every 5 minutes". Since when was this the case? There are maybe 4 players who have moved their vote around 2 or 3 times over the course of 500 posts.

I read that part of the statement more clearly than the rest because it is an obvious exaggeration. Especially when it is  used to paint someone in a bad light. This is not like you at all. You are usually very thorough, not hyperbolic.