theprof00 said:
Votals: [7,L-2] radishhead: (dtewi), nordlead, Hephaestos, Final-Fan, GodofWar_3ever, Wonktonodi, (Kantor), TruckOSaurus, dtewi [3,L-6] Kantor: (theprof00), theprof00, Homer_Simpson, noname2200 [1,L-8] TruckOSaurus: dsister, (noname2200) [1,L-8] Homer_Simpson: Kantor [0] Final-Fan: (GodofWar_3ever), (theprof00), (theprof00) [0] GodofWar_3ever: (Final-Fan), (nordlead) [0] noname2200: (TruckOSaurus) [0] Heaphaestos: (GodofWar_3ever) [0] Vetteman94: (dtewi) [0] theprof00: (Kantor) [0] No Lynch: (radishhead)
Ok, so looking through my suspects again, it appears that they have all voted for radish. This seems odd to me. And not in a good way. I highly doubt they would all jump on a bandwagon to lynch a townie. The only possible explanations are either a) only one or two of them is mafia and radish is a townie, or b) they are all mafia and so is radish
So, I decided to look at the people who haven't voted for radish at all, assuming that they are distancing themselves from the lynch (or mislynch) represented by scenario a.
So, we end up with this list:
dsis-tos homer- kantor linkz- none mg94-none noname- tos>kantor radish- none? stefl-none prof- kantor>ff>ff>kantor vette- none
Out of those people, we have a list of people who have barely contributed: dsis mg94 stefl vette
Left over, we have noname radish prof homer linkz
Now, the first four haven't been very active. Dsis made some points that I would call pro-town. But he hasn't really been here that much, has barely commented on anything or really contributed much else. Pro-town statements could simply be cover
MG94 is similar here, however, I would say he's contirbuted more than dsis, but doesn't look as pro-town as dsis appears to be.
stefl has been absent too, and has only really appeared in order to verify some statements others have been making. I'd say he's contributed less than both of the above.
Vette only showed up to argue with me. While I would call those contributions, it also has to be said that it could be simply "safe" dialogue. ie; no real risk or opinion, simply logic and facts (even strictly so). This is not a bad thing, though, and I always get a scum read on vette, so I really don't know what to think about him. He just always plays so straight that it's hard to tell. Is the straight laced executive a coke dealer?
For the second group of five we have
noname: I really feel he's made most of the good contributions so far. Good interrogation and pressure application. I would almost leave him off the list.
radish: playing poorly, everyone can see that. Not really going to linger on him.
prof: I'll let someone else fill this in
homer: made a poor vote on kantor but other than that has been contributing. Not sure what to think of him. I feel that if radish is mafia, then so is homer.
linkz: Still not sure what to think. I know linkz is a very good player and has good intuitions but I haven't seen any real contributions from him. He is on call working, so I can't fault him for being absent, but I am also concerned that if he is indeed mafia, we are going to have a tough game ahead of us.
So, to finish this up; dsis, vette, mg, and stefl: Why have you been absent, and why have you not voted for anyone despite large amounts of evidence against several people? And no, the answer to the first question does not answer the second one. Even wonk found his way into a vote despite his absence.
I would like to know what each of you have to say about radish, kantor, homer and anyone else.
|