Wonktonodi said:
Vetteman94 said:
Wonktonodi said:
Well we'd have to believe someone enough to vote for someone else. Nord's story was much less believable so that made him the most likely target and so we'd then be more inclined to believe Stefl. If we then take out the third person who was a cop the next day. It would still be another day till we could lynch Stefl for a lie. In that time the mafia would take out a few more and they would have gotten the cop. Risky on their part if caught but not enough to just loose the game. While if believed it could take even longer to find out.
I wasn't saying a third would come up mafia I was saying if Stefl is fake but the real cop showed up who would be believed more.
|
You seem to be getting away from the point here. If Stefl was really lying about his role, the real cop would have come forward instantly. But that didnt happen. Because no one came forward and claimed otherwise there was no reason to not believe him. Sure his role came with an odd limitation, but other roles have had this limitation. He came up with a scum hit on his investigation and we lynched them and it was correct.
And it goes back to my original point, you had no problems throwing a vote on radishhead for lying, why not nordlead for basically the same thing? Its because he is your fellow mafioso isn't it? You being new you didn't know how to react to the situation of one of your friends getting caught so you just tried to lay low.
Well thats my take on the situation anyway.
|
Why would the "real cop" come forward instantly? Is there a rule that there can be only one cop? Is there a rule that there can be only full rolls and not half rolls? I didn't vote because if we took more time we could have gotten more info from stefl. If i were to have just voted for nord you could be saying I just voted for him since he was alreadya gonner. You complain about my vote for radish, yet you complain about my vote for nord for the opposite reason. So from my perspective it seems it's not the reasoning you are going for but the person, me.
My vote for radish was from reasons listed. I worded it poorly then and can't deny that but it was about lies but his alone. I voted GOW over his own lies as well. Nord was a different story because I don't think he's the only one lying. If we had taken longer it might have let them slip up.
You could very well be in on it as well coming after me for coming up with the idea, saying that it couldn't happen so others don't think it's possible and then try and make me look like scum to either get me to stop making the argument or to get me lynched.
FOS vetteman94 and stefl1504
|
The real cop would come forward instantly to out a scum trying to fake roleclaim. And while there may not be a rule for it, I cant remember a game here that we had 2 cops. There is a deputy role that we have used often and they replace the cop when he dies but he is just a regular townie until then. There is no rule against limiting powers to a certain number of nights, alot of roles are limited like that to reduce their power, its rare to see it in a cop though.
Im not complaining about your vote for radish, I'm complaining about your lack of a vote for nordlead, for the same reasons, despite having the chance to vote for him 3 times. He lied, so did radish and so did GodofWar, but you had no problems voting for the other 2 so why not nordlead? You say it so we could have more discussion, but you didnt really have any discussion after that. Your only comment after the three I posted was how you wish you wold have lynched radish instead of Kantor the first day. If more discussion was important to you didnt you add more than that? Why didnt you talk more about the situation at hand with everyone else? Its because you didnt care.
So whats your idea? That stefl is mafia posing as a cop? So are you saying that the real cop hasn't come forward or that we just don't have one at all?