So far as I know it's on the same engine they then tweaked, therefore I expect the same basic split between the two.  From what I've read though it sounds like the game is just buggy as reviews mention bugs both in the 360 and PS3 version.

I'm gonna wait for patches, etc. to settle this one down I think before I bother.  I get the feeling that, as often happens, one developer building on code from another resulted in more bugs being added to the equation.

Fixed it for you. To anyone out there upset by this my advice is to get the pc version. Which you can probably run even if you think you can't

Not again...

i wanted to get it on the 360 anyways i learned my mistake from fallout 3 when i got it on ps3 and PC and i saw the epic difference :O but i like playing single player games on xbox 360 more than PC smtimes

Ahhh crap...... It's clunky enough without the bugs. And Fallout 3 GOTY edition had freezes and awful loading times too.

sometimes, but only sometimes, i think Bethesda may be a bunch of noobs, 'trying' to programm something, that sucks ass later.

seriously, i decided to get New Vegas, but .. i mean... do they have a bug in their moral code? bringing games out unpolished? (Or DLC?)

I can't see a (notable) difference.

That's true, but I had way more issues with Fallout 3 on PS3 than on 360. Obsidian promised an equal experience across platforms for New Vegas, though, and it sounds like 360 owners will get to enjoy having their game turn into a slideshow and/or lock up EVERY SINGLE TIME SOMETHING COOL HAPPENS this time around.

what the hell is happening here?

what i saw from the comparison all screenshot were much better on PS3 ver.

and why everybody were saying PS3 is the inferior ver. 

the top picture is PS3 ver. no??

strange discussion here...

why are they better? please explain.

if the stairwaylike Walls are something you prefer, you can go with them, but normally, AA > No AA.

(be sure to click 'in originalgröße Anzeigen', to see the Screens in full Size.)