You will.

You $ony fan you...

Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups.

I posted a lot of negative thread about the PS3 too. I also posted a lot of positive thread about the 360 too.  This is a forum, I am entitled to post anything I like that doesn't break any rules. You don't even know me so don't post crap like that.

You just called Platinum games shitty.

You called a game you probably haven't played crappy.

It's one of the best looking multi-platform games being released this year and you called it ugly.

I think you have an agenda.

Thoroughly amused that YOU would accuse someone of having an agenda.

Never heard of subs? Original language English or Spanish subs is the way to go for me.

I will negate the insults from the other X360 fanboy's since you all are not worth my time.

It's all good, I got ya now.  I think that it's a little different though and the two really can't be compared.  Sony was a major force behind the creation of Blu Ray (not the only one, but definitely one of the bigger if not the biggest), so they really had a vested interest on multiple levels to make Blu Ray mandatory in the PS3, it not only allowed devs as much space as possible to work with the newer architecture of the PS3 (which turns out to be a good move) while also allowing PS3 owners immediate entry into Blu Ray (yes the TV is awefully expensive, but soooo worth it). 

MS on the other hand simply backed HD-DVD's existence, they weren't financially invested in it's survival (Toshiba and NEC were the primary developers of HD-DVD).  Microsoft has been far more interested in promoting and pushing sales digitally, that's been their song and dance since day 1, even while they had an HD-DVD option.  They never really pushed HD-DVD in any way if you think about it.  It was more of a shoehorn approach than a real adoption of the format.

The important factor here is though, current PS3 games are still not maxxing out the capacity of the disc they're on.  Which makes it possible for devs to make monstrous games without really worrying about space restrictions.  That'll be a continuing benefit for the PS3 in the long run.  Whereas, the 360's already hitting 3-disc games.  Not hugely important for gamers, maybe, but printing out discs on a 3:1 ratio could get hairy if it's a hugely popular IP, not to mention starting to cost more and more money.  Sure, not a big issue right now that's been proven to be an issue yet, but the 360 supposedly has what, 4 more years left in it?  Long story short (ok, maybe long story long), while it made it more expensive up front, it actually makes the PS3 much more capable of running the final leg than it's competition, imo.

Who am I? I admit to liking the PS3 more, I also criticize the faults that follow my PS3. Just because I dislike certain things about other consoles, it doesn't mean I don't enjoy playing them or that I don't want their faults to be improved. I don't have a secret agenda and if I did I wouldn't let it warp my judgement so much that I'd be willing to slam a critically acclaimed developer and a game that I haven't played yet. 

Bungie seemed to do just fine with Halo Reach, and Mass Effect 2 didnt suffer by being on two

With Basara 3, that was purely a PR excuse.  The Wii version only takes about 4GB of game data, there was way more than enough space for dual language tracks on a DVD... more likely they didn't want to pay for rights to use the (expensive) JP voice cast overseas for such a niche game.  

That's also why Basara 3 had no online play or DLC, because it wasn't deemed necessary for Japan and the game was too niche in the west to warrant the cost.  The fact that the Wii exclusive Samurai Warriors 3 managed both dual voice and online play/DLC just adds insult to injury. :/