TheRealMafoo said:
In the US, I am against the federal government executing people. The Constitution forbids the federal government from taking your life. States can do whatever they want however, as the US Constitution only limits the federal government. Each state has a right to make there own call on what there Constitution says.
As a personal postion, I have no problem with it. If you committed horrific crimes, you have given up your opportunity for me to care about you.
I guess the only issue I have with it from a moral position, is sometimes they are wrongfully accuses, and killed when they didn't commit the crime. This is far less then activists would want you to believe, but I am sure it has happened a few times.
|
Far less? I wouldn't be so sure, the cases where death penalty was inflicted due to the early, now considered quite unreliable, DNA tests, and where the defence was denied a new, more reliable test, are in quite large number. Not to mention that where complicity in a murder can receive up to the same penalty for murder, the possibility that the actual murderer accept plea bargaining first and receives a smaller penalty, while accomplices receive death penalty, is a legal abomination.
And also: accepting death penalty for murder, in case an innocent is executed, wouldn't be fair to execute judge, jury and executioner? I know that if an innocent person I love were unjustly executed, I'd kill them.
Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW!

