huaxiong90 said:
Fair enough, I understand it's not written in the most objective manner, and I also acknowledge some arguments are a stretch. I'm just asking you to look at the main arguments which have sources backing up his claims. |
His sources are specious and his arguments are too emotional to be convincing. His assumption that the death penalty is a result of higher crime rates rather than the other way around is fallacious; it assumes causation because of correlation, which ignores dozens of intervening factors.







