axt113 said:
Khuutra said:
axt113 said:
Khuutra said:
You talk about sales figures withotu actually citing any and without giving qualifications for any of htem, particularly qualifying what constitutes "failure".
The only game which you refer to which couldh ave reasonably been expected to move hardware would have been Mario Galaxy and (possibly) Twilight Princess - you point out, rightly, that neither of these games coincided with a marked uptick in Wii system sale.s But that's a fallacious point in and of itself. Don't you remember? SMG released in 2007, back when the Wii was sitll selling out every week. Causing a trackable uptick in adoption wouldn't have been possible for any game, including NSMBWii, when the system was already selling out. The context in which you are citing these numebrs is already wrong.
Name theg ames in 2-D that have been shown to push hardware on the Wii. I believe you can name.... one. When it comes to 3-D games that can move hardware, I can name at least five (Mario Kart, Wii Sports, Resort, Fit, Plus, Play, and yes, even Galaxy).
You have not qualified any of hte games you're referring to as failures - but don't bother with Other M, I agree that it is a failure. It should be mentioned though that it was not a failure as a hardware mover, because it was never intended to move hardware.
Again, yoru assertions so far are not grounded in reality. Cite games. Cite sale figures. Weh ave a tab right up there - it's "VGChartz" - where you can grab all the figrues you need.
|
I can point to other games from the GCN and N64 era if you;d like, heck I can point to those whole eras as evidence, what would you like to see? Tell me what sales figures you want.
Galaxy two proves this second argument false, where was the uptick from galaxy 2, also lets compare Galaxy one or two to NSMB, NSMB ignited sales during last holiday, are you really going to try and argue that my point is wrong? Lets also go back to the GCN eras and look at Mario sunshine and compare to NSMB for console selling power if you don't like Galaxy, why didn't GCN experience the boosts from Mario? So Galaxy no, didn't push any hardware, if you really want to argue that, I suggest you look at GCN and Sunshine.
As for the Wii games and Kart, I never disagreed those push hardware, from the beginning I said those were fine, so you're arguing a non-issue, since I never said Nintendo should abandon those games, not once, but as I pointed out earlier those are expanded audience games, I'm not detracting those genres, I agree those genres should be covred by Nintendo, so you're arguing a different issue than what I said altogether. Since I already said from the beginning that those games are fine, go read my earlier posts, those aren't the games that I think should not be in 3D. Since the beginning, my point has been about the core games, read my earlier posts, games like galaxy, Zelda and Metorid and the like.
|
Referring to less successful hardware generations as indicative of current trends and varied software environments is fallacious. Try pointing to the Playstation and the Playstation 2, instead.
Galaxy 2 isn't proper as a hardware mover in that it was a sequel and doesn't appeal to more people that the original didn't already appeal to. Try again.
Galaxy was selling during a time that the Wii was already sold out. If you released NSMBWii during that season, it would have had exactly as much effect as Galaxy did. Yes, your comparison - and your point - is verifiably, objectively, completely wrong.
You have given no evidence for Zelda being better in 2D or anything of the sort; do you posit that the series should simply be abandoned?
Let me make sure I'm getting this straight. I know I am, but I'm going to ask you a series of questions. THis is the first, and if you can, keep your answer down to either yes or no:
Do you posit that Nintendo should abandon all games and series that are not "proven hardware movers", which coincide with sustained increased sales?
I'm going to bed. I expect a (brief) answer in the morning, when I will ask my next question.
Humor me.
|
We aren't discussing Playstation, we are discussing Nintendo, and why do you think those gens were less successful, lol, no old school games like Mario, lol
I did, I pointed to Sunshine, since you don;t like Galaxy, and showed you that it didn;t have console moving power
Nope, since Sunshine proves my point about Galaxy
As for Zelda, the series may need to be abandoned, but I have a feeling that the game would do better in 2D than in 3D, since outside of OoT, the 3D version have done worse even when install bases are larger, like TP selling worse than OoT even though the number of Wii's far outnumbers N64, so I say a 2D game for comparisons sake would prove whether the series had run its course or not.
I can;t respond with just a yes or no, I can respond with this though, Nintendo should abandon what doesn't increase sales or keep momentum going, so abandoning 3D Mario would be wise, as I've shown, Sunshine proves that Galaxy was not a mover, whether or not Wii was selling out, with Zelda and Metroid, the 3D should definitely be abandoned, the series perhaps, depending on how well the 2D games did.
By abandoing those things, Nintendo can refocus on the games that do move hardware and keep momentum
|
