By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Evolution in action (following the progress of 44,000 generations)

A team of microbiologists at Michigan State University have just revealed the results of a 20 year experiment looking at the evolution of the bacterium E. coli over 44,000 generations. The report is too long to paste here so the link is below.

http://richarddawkins.net/articles/2669

Breifly, the team incubated the bacteria in bottles containing glucose (which E. coli can use as a food and carbon source) and continuously took samples, adding them to new bottles with a fresh supply of glucose (freezing samples periodically). After repeating this process for 20 years they got some very interesting results. The bacteria in the most recent bottles are able to grow ~75% faster than the original strains showing that they have adapted to feed of a pure glucose source (at the expense of other sugars that they could previously use).

Even more fascinating was the discovery that some cultures of the E. coli were now using citrate present in the media as their sole carbon source (something E. coli could not previously do). Somewhere along the line (~31,500 generations) a mutation occured allowing the E. coli to consume the citrate and these descendants then began to outcompete the non-citrate eaters.

 

I thought this was a really intersting study that shows evolution at work. If you read the full text in the link you'll see that they suggest small mutations through out the bacteriums history were key in allowing such a key step to evolve.



Around the Network

Why the term micro-evolution? It's all just evolution.



Micro-evolution usually only pertains to changes in the gene pool over generations, whereas macro-evolution is a much larger change which consists of the introduction of new modes of movement (say from soley swimming to being able to move on land), mass extinction (like the dinosaurs) and adaptive radiation (like with Darwin's finches).

Both fall under evolution, so it wouldn't be incorrect to call this evolution. I remember hearing religious people came up with these terms initially, although I'm foggy on the details.



But evolution's fake! We all know god created the earth and everything on it just a few thousand years ago, right?



Nintendo Network ID: Cheebee   3DS Code: 2320 - 6113 - 9046

 

Ooohhh ecoli, damn my adrenaline is pumping! What's next plankton?



Around the Network
Rath said:

Why the term micro-evolution? It's all just evolution.

 Of course, I was just pointing out it was showing gene by gene evolution. Didn't mean anything sinister with using that term!



CrazyHorse said:
Rath said:

Why the term micro-evolution? It's all just evolution.

 Of course, I was just pointing out it was showing gene by gene evolution. Didn't mean anything sinister with using that term!


I just get annoyed with the term because Creationists use it to imply that 'real' evolution doesn't happen =P



raptors11 said:

Ooohhh ecoli, damn my adrenaline is pumping! What's next plankton?

Ok, maybe not the most exotic organism but I thought it was pretty exiciting to see evolution actaully take place in an observed time frame! Unfortunately bacteria provide the only opportunities for these kind of studies.



Rath said:
CrazyHorse said:
Rath said:

Why the term micro-evolution? It's all just evolution.

 Of course, I was just pointing out it was showing gene by gene evolution. Didn't mean anything sinister with using that term!


I just get annoyed with the term because Creationists use it to imply that 'real' evolution doesn't happen =P

You can be assured that definately wasn't my intention! =p  In fact, I think I'll edit the post just to be clear!



Awesome, pretty cool to actually see evolution in action!