Paris Hilton. Kim Kardashian. Nicole Richie. Kevin Federline

Is the only exception to this is inheritance?  Because of the sheer amount of money that is handed out, and it makes someone rich, certain individuals who didn't do squat have every right to get more money than they ever would know what to do with, they have every right to get every penny.  Should we also abolish charity, and have it if individuals are not able to find meaningful work, they should be left to die of starvation?

It is called the trickle down theory. Even though the rich are rich, they spend all of that money in places that give other people jobs such as stocks, retail, car sales, etc. And the thing that everyone seems to forgot is that these rich peole get charged taxes on everything they spend money on. Spread the wealth rewards those that work and suck off the system.  And by taxing the rich more, they will not spend the same. the reason taxes are done by percentages is because it equalizes the system   30 percent of a 10 million dollar income is 3 million dollars to the government.  It all works out it just happens to be that this economy sucks right now.

The argument is that someone else earned it and is free to give it to whomever they like, and private property rights extend to the wishes of those who are dead.   Either that or that the fact it is so much money involved, it is an exception to the rule.

If you read Aftershock, you will see the argument laid out that the rich don't spend money in sufficient amounts to stimulate the economy.  The money builds on itself, and keeps earning more money, as they invited in plants in China, that create jobs there.

Hunger is a motivation to steal food to eat. Starving to death would be a slow painful way to die. Crime does pay: 3 meals a day and a roof over your head.  

Why not just lock thieves in caskets that they would die of starvation in?  Why should food be provided to criminals? 

look at it this way. Is it better for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer?

To tell the truth, I believe we have enough resources to house everyone with homes and food for everyone around the world. I also think the reason why there is a lot of unemployment is because we have excess amount of resources. This is why money base economy fails imo.

wealth is already bad in the hands of the people that have it, but i haft to say it would be more usful in the hands of those that arn't wealthy

So what you have a problem with inheritance? You think money shouldn't be able to be passed down to your children? I have no problem whatsoever with inheritance as long as people don't inherit a ton of money and use it as an excuse not to work. If I won the lottery I'd still stay in school and get a job.

And when did I anyone ever say anythin about abolishing charity? Charity is fine as long as donating to charity is optional. My dad is wealthy and he donates both to our local hospital and to a local foundation for mentally retarded people.

And should we leave people to die if they can't afford food? That's an interesting question, because I'm sure you'd be quick to say no but then I wonder how much have you donated to food banks or charities in your life? Do you personally help at all or do you think it should be up to the rich to provide food for the poor?