that maybe so but its still a classic and gone down in movie history like i said and parodied a lot,i would have thought bladerunner would be his biggest success

No. The Chariots of Fire and 1492 soundtracks were worldwide hits and sold million of copies. The OST for CoF sold several  million copies in the first year alone, the title theme was a worldwide single hit and became one of the most succesful instrumental tracks in movie history. Despite their successes both soundtracks are among the most unsuitable ones I've ever heard, but it doesn't really matter as both movies suck and are widely forgotten.

The brilliant original Blade Runner soundtrack was first released 12 years after the movie and became a cult classic, just like the movie (which was initially a flop - E.T was released the same summer and completely dominated the worldwide boxofffice in 1982).

A few years back, I watched it to see what all the hub bub was about and TBH, I thought it was meh on average... Some parts were facking brilliant like the SE , atmosphere and Harrison Ford's acting (I'm a Harrison Ford fanboy! 8> ) while other parts were unbelievably boring...

After my initial viewing, I decided to listen to the directors commentary. About 30 minutes in, I figured out what the source of my Bladerunner woes were... Ridley Scott. He's perhaps the most boring person I've ever listened to EVA! I think some of his personality accidentally found it's way into the plot...

Then you probably hate Apocalypse Now. Personally, I love it when a director leaves major plot points up to the audience. In my opinion, we need more directors that treat an audience with respect and not like mouth-breathing, mentally disabled nitwits.

True.  True.  I just hate the whole 'explain this' mentality.  The whole point of a film like Blade Runner - or the novel on which it is based - is you experience it for yourself.  The whole idea of a neat pamplet explaining it all is just horrible for me.  Put some leg work in and think for yourself is my motto.

That being said, the setting, exploration of what it means to be human - and by extension inhuman - plus in Roy Batty one of the coolest characters commited to film, coupled with what is still arguably the most convincing portrayal of a futuristic city make for something special if you watch this is on a very big screen.

Every frame of the film is astonishing in its depth of information and clarity of composition.  If only more SF films like this existed vs tripe like Transformers (although the first one was actually okay, but the second seriously nuked the fridge while screwing the pooch at the same time).

its also a good sci-fi thriller

in simple terms

All this and a stunning fresh view of the future, as it was the first to mix the old and the new, the west and the east. It is definitely the most influential movie of the 80s.

In the end, Reasonable is right. It is a movie about humanity. What is to be human in a dehumanized society, which is an extreme version of ours own.

Yes, because Blade Runner is obviously a nonsensical arthouse film. What was I thinking?

Ahahahahahahah, I've never heard that before. Brilliant.

ok, fine and that's my interpretation.  I just think that an android fighting to put other androids out of business sounds way too much like a gay pastor that goes to dimly lit parks.   But, please feel free to have your own opinion on the matter.